Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 6618 (GAU)

SRI GANESH SARKAR v. THE STATE OF ASSAM

I.A.(Crl.)/506/2026 · 2026-05-19

Michael Zothankhuma, Sanjeev Kumar Sharma

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010089562026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Crl.)/506/2026 SRI GANESH SARKAR SON OF -GOBARDHAN SARKAR, VILL-SARUCHARI TEA ESTATE, POST OFFICE - SOCKALATING, POLICE STATION - PULIBOR, DISTRICT - JORHAT, ASSAM, PIN- 785703 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE P.P. ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MRS. S KHATANIAR, Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, Linked Case : ST.Rev./0/0 SRI GANESH SARKAR SON OF -GOBARDHAN SARKAR VILL-SARUCHARI TEA ESTATE POST OFFICE - SOCKALATING POLICE STATION - PULIBOR DISTRICT - JORHATASSAM PIN- 785703 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE P.P. ASSAM ------------ Advocate for : MRS SANGEETA KHATANIAR Advocate for : appearing for THE STATE OF ASSAM Page No.# 2/2 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MICHAEL ZOTHANKHUMA HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV KUMAR SHARMA ORDER Date : 20.05.2026 (M. Zothankhuma, J) Heard Mrs. S. Khataniar, learned counsel for the applicant, who submits that there is a delay of 994 days in filing the appeal against the conviction of the applicant-appellant under Section 376(1) IPC. 2. Mr. R.R. Kaushik, learned Addl. P.P submits that he has got no objection to the delay being condoned. 3. Accordingly, the delay of 994 days is condoned. 4. Registry to register the connected appeal and list the same. 5. The I.A. is accordingly disposed of. JUDGE JUDGE Comparing Assistant