Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 6618 (BOM)

ABDUL NAIM SO ABDUL SAMAD AND ORS v. MOHAMMAD KABIR MOHAMMAD LAL PATEL DIED AND ORS

CA/9994/2026 · 2026-09-02

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

971 CA NO. 9994 OF 2026.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 971 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 9994 OF 2026 IN SAST/18255/2026 Abdul Naim So Abdul Samad And Ors VERSUS Mohammad Kabir Mohammad Lal Patel Died And Ors ... Mr. G R Syed, Advocate for Applicant Mr. A. P. Gaikwad, Advocate for Respondent No.1/D …. CORAM : SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J. DATE : 02.09.2026 PER COURT :- 1. Heard. 2. This is an application for condonation of delay of 02 days caused in filing the Second Appeal. 3. The learned Advocate for respondent No.1/D strongly opposed the application and submitted that there is no sufficient reason to condone the delay. 4. Perused the application. For the reasons stated therein, the application deserves to be allowed in the interest of justice as the delay is neither deliberate nor intentional. Hence the following order: 1 of 2 (( 2 )) 971 CA NO. 9994 OF 2026 ::ORDER:: a. Civil Application is allowed. b. The delay of 02 days caused in filing the Second Appeal is condoned. c. The application is disposed of. FIRST APPEAL 1. Issue notice to the respondents, returnable on 23.09.2026. 2. Learned Advocate Mr. A. P. Gaikwad waives service of notice for Respondent No.1D. [ SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J. ] HRJadhav 2 of 2