Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 66166 (MAD)

Abiramaiah v. The District Collector

WP/4879/2026 · 2026-02-17

Abdul Quddhose

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

WP No. 4879 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 17-02-2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE WP No. 4879 of 2026 1. Abiramaiah Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The District Collector O/o.District Collectorate Office Krishnagiri District. 2.Deputy Tahsildar Denkanikottai Taluk Krishnagiri District. Respondent(s) PRAYER Directing the respondents to consider and dispose of the petitioners representation dated 19.07.2025 for transfer of patta with regard to the property comprised in Survey No. 586/4D, 586/4F, 586/5C, 586/5D, 588/3, 588/5A, 588/5B, 589/2A, 589/2B, 589/3A, situated in Karandapalli Village, Denkanikottai Taluk, Krishnagiri District within a time frame to be fixed by this Court. For Petitioner(s): Mr.F. Sabastin For Respondent(s): Mr.R.P.Murugan Raja Govt Advocate For Respondent ORDER This writ petition has been filed to direct the respondents to transfer the patta for the property morefully described in the prayer to this writ petition in favour of the petitioner based on the petitioner’s representation dated 19.07.2025 within a time frame to be fixed by this Court. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 4879 of 2026 2. The petitioner had filed supporting documents along with the petitioner’s representation dated 19.07.2025 with the respondents, seeking for transfer of patta in his name for the property morefully described in the prayer to this writ petition. Since the said representation has not been considered till date, this writ petition has been filed. 3. Mr. R. P. Murugan Raja, learned Government Advocate accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. 4. No prejudice would be caused to the respondents if the petitioner’s representation as stated supra is considered on merits and in accordance with law after hearing the objections of the neighbouring land owners if any and any other third party whom the second respondent deems it fit to enquire within a time frame to be fixed by this Court. 5. This Court is not expressing any opinion on the merits of the petitioner’s representation. 6. For the foregoing reasons, this Court directs the second respondent to pass final orders on merits and in accordance with law on the petitioner’s representation dated 19.07.2025, seeking for transfer of patta in his name for the https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 4879 of 2026 property morefully described in the prayer to this writ petition within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order after hearing the objections of the neighbouring land owners if any and any other third party whom the second respondent deems it fit to enquire. 7. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of. No Costs. 17-02-2026 Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes Neutral Citation:Yes/No ab To 1.The District Collector O/o.District Collectorate Office Krishnagiri District. 2.Deputy Tahsildar Denkanikottai Taluk Krishnagiri District. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 4879 of 2026 ABDUL QUDDHOSE J. ab WP No. 4879 of 2026 17-02-2026 (2/4) https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis