Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 6616 (AP)

K.Eshwaramma, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/12492/2016 · 2026-07-20

Harinath N

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010636802016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] TUESDAY, THE 21st DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 12492/2016 Between: 1. K.ESHWARAMMA,, W/O.K.RAMANA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD, R/O. D.NO.10-2-64/1, O.V.ROAD, KANDUKUR, PRAKASHAM DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP., BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, SECRETARIAT, HYDERABAD. 2. THE KANDUKUR MUNICIPALITY, KANDUKUR, PRAKASHAM DISTRICT REP. BY ITS COMMISSIONER ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue an appropriate Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent No.2 in interfering with the possession and enjoyment of the petitioner and trying to demolish the house property bearing D.No.10- 2-64/1, O.V. Road, Kandukur, Prakasham District and trying to install a statue in the land owned by the petitioner as arbitrary, illegal, colorable exercise of power, contrary to the well settled legal principles, apart from being violative of the fundamental and Constitutional Rights guaranteed to the petitioner under Articles 14, 19, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondent No.2 not to interfere with the rights of the petitioner over the house property bearing D.No.10-2-64/1, O.V. Road, Kandukur, Prakasham District IA NO: 1 OF 2016(WPMP 15646 OF 2016 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent No.2 not to interfere with the rights of the petitioner over the house property bearing D.No.10-2-64/1, O.V. Road, Kandukur, Prakasham District, pending disposal of the writ petition Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SANJEEV GILLELA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP-MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV(AP) The Court made the following: THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION No.12492 OF 2016 ORDER: 1. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cause in the writ petition has outlived its purpose. 2. Recording the submission, the writ petition is closed. No costs. 3. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this writ petition shall stand closed. ____________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Dt.21.07.2026 KGM 215 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION No.12492 OF 2016 Dated 21.07.2026 KGM