IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.5939 of 2026 Date of Decision: 23.04.2026 _______________________________________________________ Sujit Bhagwan …….Petitioners Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & others … Respondents _______________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? 1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Vivek Thakur, Legal Aid Counsel. For the Respondents: Mr. Rajan Kahol & Mr. Vishal Panwar, Additional Advocate Generals with Mr. Ravi Chauhan & Mr. Anish Banshtu, Deputy Advocates General. ____________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, Judge(oral): Learned counsel representing the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present petition with liberty to file afresh application for parole before the competent authority, disclosing therein the correct address of his sister as well as his father, thereby enabling the authority concerned to process the application. Ordered accordingly. 2. Needless to say, the filing of the present petition as well as passing of instant order shall not be a bar for the competent authority to process the application, if any, filed afresh for grant of 1Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 parole, rather same shall be considered and decided in accordance with the rules occupying the field. (Sandeep Sharma), Judge April 23,2026 (shankar)