HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 8485 of 2026 Court No. - 71 HON'BLE RAJIV LOCHAN SHUKLA, J. 1. Supplementary affidavit on behalf of the applicant, filed today in Court, is taken on the record. 2. Heard Learned Counsel for the applicant; and Learned A.G.A. for the State. 3. The present anticipatory bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicant in Case Crime No. 107 of 2026, under Sections 305, 331(4) and 61(2)A of the B.N.S., 2023, Police Station – Babina, District Jhansi, with a prayer to enlarge him on anticipatory bail, as the applicant apprehends his arrest in the aforesaid case. 4. Learned Counsel for the applicant contends that the First Information Report (FIR) was lodged against unknown persons. The name of the applicant has surfaced during the investigation in the statement of the co- accused. The applicant has no previous criminal case registered against him with respect to theft or any allied offence. The applicant has a criminal history of one other case which involves minor offences under Sections 323, 504, 506 I.P.C. 5. Learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for bail but does not dispute the factual assertions made by the Learned Counsel for the applicant. Learned A.G.A. has stated that the investigation is in progress and the applicant may be required for custodial interrogation and recoveries. 6. I have considered the submissions made by the learned counsel for the parties. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Bhriguram Ji Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Robin Pal .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) 7. Co-accused Vivek Prajapati alias Shaka and Rajraja alias Raj Thakur have been arrested by the police and have been granted regular bail. Recoveries have also been made from the co-accused. The applicant has no criminal antecedent of like offences in his criminal history. 8. Taking note of the antecedents of the applicant, his young age who is stated to be only about twenty years old and the other attending facts and circumstances of the case, I deem it appropriate to grant anticipatory bail to the applicant. 9. The anticipatory bail application of the applicant is allowed. 10. In the event of the arrest of the applicant- Robin Pal, involved in the aforesaid case crime, he shall be released on anticipatory bail, on his furnishing a personal bond and surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Station House Officer of the police station/Court concerned, with the following conditions:- i. The applicant shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required; ii. The applicant shall not, directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer; iii. The applicant shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court; iv. The applicant shall not pressurize/intimidate the prosecution witness; 11. In case of breach of any of the above conditions, the Court concerned shall be at liberty to cancel the bail. 12. It is made clear that observations made hereinabove are exclusively for deciding the instant anticipatory bail application and are not to be considered to be an opinion on the merits of the case. September 14, 2026 Kushal NABAIL No. 8485 of 2026 2 (Rajiv Lochan Shukla,J.) Digitally signed by :- KUSHAL AGRAWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad