UMAR MOHAMMAD SON OF SHRI JANGI v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/3816/2026 · 2026-03-13
Pramil Kumar Mathur
Transfer Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 6611 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 6611 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:10644] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 3816/2026 Umar Mohammad Son Of Shri Jangi, Aged About 48 Years, Resident Of Village Kathol, Police Station- Pahari, District-Deeg (Rajasthan) (At Present Accused Is Confined In District Jail Deeg) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Arafat Hussain For Respondent(s) : Mr. Devi Singh, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR
Order 13/03/2026
1. The petitioner has preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.200/2021 registered at Police Station Khoh, District Bharatpur for offences under Sections 3, 5 and 8 of Rajasthan Bovine Animal (Prohibition of Slaughter and Regulation of Temporary Migration or Export) Act, 1995.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. The allegation levelled against the petitioner is that he is the registered owner of the vehicle bearing No. HR-55-S-1617, which is alleged to have been involved in the present matter except this no other act has been attributed to him. Petitioner is behind the bars since 17.02.2026 without any criminal past. The trial of the case will take
[2026:RJ-JP:10644] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-3816/2026] considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in further custody, consequently the bail application deserves to be allowed.
4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application.
5. On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and in light of submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner.
6. Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that the petitioner Umar Mohammad Son Of Shri Jangi, be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial.
(PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Chandan/50