Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 6607 (RAJ)

PAYAL KUMAWAT D/O SHRI KANARAM KUMAWAT, W/O MONU KUMAWAT, v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLW/464/2026 · 2026-03-27

Anil Kumar Upman

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:13130] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 464/2026 1. Payal Kumawat D/o Shri Kanaram Kumawat, W/o Monu Kumawat, Aged About 19 Years, R/o Kumawato Ki Dhani, Chandsen, Malpura, District Tonk, At Present R/o Kumawato Ki Dhani, Geroli, District Tonk 2. Monu Kumawat S/o Ramlal Kumawat, Aged About 24 Years, Kumawato Ki Dhani, Geroli, District Tonk ----Petitioners Versus 1. The State of Rajasthan through Principal Secretary, Department of Home, Govt. of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur 2. Director General of Police, Police H.Q. Lalkothi, Jaipur 3. Superintendent of Police, Tonk 4. SHO, Police Station, Diggi Nukkad, District Tonk 5. Kanaram Kumawat S/o Birdhi Chand Kumawat, R/o Kumawato Ki Dhani, Chandsen, Malpura, District Tonk 6. Deepak See/o Kanaram Kumawat, R/o Kumawato Ki Dhani, Chandsen, Malpura, District Tonk ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ankit Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vijay Singh Yadav, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 27/03/2026 1. Defects pointed out by the registry are overruled. 2. Petitioners are major and present in person. They have duly been identified by their counsel. 3. This criminal writ petition has been filed by petitioners seeking protection from the private respondent Nos.5 and 6 as they are apprehending danger to their life and liberty at the hands of private respondents. [2026:RJ-JP:13130] (2 of 2) [CRLW-464/2026] 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that both the petitioners are mature enough to take decision of their life. He submits that petitioners have entered into marriage as per Hindu Rites and Customs at Arya Samaj Moti Katala, Jaipur, Rajasthan on 18.03.2026 and same has been registered before the Office of Marriage Registration Officer, Kishanpole Zone, Jaipur, Rajasthan. The certificate of registration of marriage of the petitioners is annexed with this petition. Counsel further submits that petitioners are living peacefully as husband and wife but respondent Nos.5 and 6 are not happy with their marriage and petitioners are receiving continuous threats from the private respondents, so they prayed for protection. 5. In view of the above factual averments, petitioners are directed to file appropriate application seeking protection before respondent No.4-Station House Officer, Police Station, Diggi Nukkad, District Tonk, Rajasthan and respondent No.4 is directed to provide protection to the petitioners, if any application is filed before him and he would ensure that no harm is caused to the petitioners. 6. The Criminal Writ Petition is, accordingly, disposed of. 7. Stay application and pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of. 8. However, it is made clear that this order will not affect the civil/criminal proceedings, if any, in the present matter. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J LALIT MOHAN /406