Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 6607 (KAR)

CHAITHRA V v. RAJANNA N R

MFA/8002/2025 · 2026-02-11

Jayant Banerji, T M Nadaf

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 PRESENT THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT BANERJI AND THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.8002 OF 2025 BETWEEN CHAITHRA V W/O RAJANNA, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, R/AT: INMICHENAHALLI VILLAGE, YELEGERE POST, KASABA HOBLI, CHIKKABALLAPURA TALUK CHIKKABALLAPURA DISTRICT. …..Appellant s (By Sriyuths. Nithya V., Bhargava B.M., Anusha L.B., Gopala M., Advocates) AND RAJANNA N.R S/O RAMAKRISHNAPPA N.R AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS R/AT: NALLAPANAHALLI VILLAGE CHANNARAYAPATNA HOBLI, DEVANAHALLI TALUK BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT. …….. Respondent This Miscellaneous First Appeal filed U/S.28(1) of Hindu Marriage Act, against the Judgment and Decree dated MFA.No.8002/2025 ------------------------- 2 05.02.2025 passed in M.C. No.15/2021 on the file of the III Additional Senior Civil Judge and JMFC, Devanahalli, C/C of II Additional Senior Civil Judge and JMFC, Devanahalli, allowing the petition filed U/S.13(1)(ia) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. This Miscellaneous First Appeal is coming on for Orders this day, the Court made th following: ORAL ORDER Learned Counsel for the appellant is permitted two weeks and no more time to remove the office objections. Failure to remove the office objections shall result in dismissal of the aforesaid appeal without any further reference to this Court. Sd/- JUDGE Sd/- JUDGE NOTE: Court Order dated.11.02.2026, not complied with. Hence Appeal stands dismissed. COPY Sd/- ASSISTANT REGISTRAR T By: BR R By: NR C By: STE