Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010236912019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] FRIDAY, THE 24th DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 854/2019 Between:
1. P.NEHEMIAH, S/O. PULADAS YOHAN, AGE. 53 YRS, OCC. JR.
LECTURER, R/O. H.NO.43-133-1B, ECM COMPOUND, NR PET, KURNOOL, KURNOOL DISTRICT, AP
...PETITIONER AND
1. R SWARUPA RANI, W/O. P NEHEMIAH, AGE. 48 YRS, OCC. PVT.
TEACHER, R/O. H.N.44/1. PRAKASH NAGAR, KURNOOL, KURNOOL DISTRICT, AP
2. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. SHANTHASREE ELIPE Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. J JANAKIRAMI REDDY The Court made the following:
2
ORDER:
The Criminal Revision Case has been filed under Sections 397 & 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 1 challenging the order dated 31.03.2017 in F.C.O.P.No.127 of 2015 passed by the learned Judge, Family Court-cum-IV Additional District Judge, Kurnool.
2. Heard the learned Counsel for the Petitioner and the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor.
3. The impugned order dated 31.03.2017 in F.C.O.P.No.127 of 2015 whereby and whereunder petition filed by a Christian husband against his wife for Restitution of Conjugal Rights was dismissed.
4. Petitioner has got an alternative efficacious remedy of filing an appropriate appeal challenging the order of the learned Family Court. Revision Case is not maintainable under Section 397 read with 401 of ‘the Cr.P.C.’
5. Hence, the Criminal Revision Case is disposed of, granting liberty to the Petitioner to file appropriate application or appeal in accordance with law, if so advised. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, interlocutory applications, if any pending, shall stand closed.
_________________________ Dr. Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J Dt: 24.07.2026 VTS
1 ‘the Cr.P.C.,’