IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.16529 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-166 Year-2025 Thana- BARHAT District- Jamui ====================================================== 1. Chandu Rajak @ Chandan Rajak S/o Klit Rajak @ Kalit Rajak R/o Village - Tetariya, P.S - Barhat, District - Jamui 2. Nandu Rajak @ Nandan Rajak S/o Klit Rajak @ Kalit Rajak R/o Village - Tetariya, P.S - Barhat, District - Jamui 3. Rabindra Rajak S/o Kartik Rajak R/o Village - Tetariya, P.S - Barhat, District - Jamui 4. Ranjan Rajak @Niranjan Rajak S/o Kartik Rajak R/o Village - Tetariya, P.S - Barhat, District - Jamui ... ... Petitioners Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Pankaj Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Raj Ballabh Singh, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 2 07-04-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 117(2), 109, 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of BNS. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioner nos. 1 and 2 have antecedent of one case and petitioner nos. 3 and 4 are persons with clean antecedent but then petitioner no. 1 was acquitted in the case and the informant alleges that accused persons including the petitioners came on Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.16529 of 2026(2) dt.07-04-2026 2/3 09.11.2025 at 04:00 PM and started abusing, on objection, Rajkumar (petitioner no.1) assaulted the informant by rod causing injury on head while Pawan Rajak (petitioner no. 2) assaulted him by khanti causing injury over the ear, thereafter, Nandu assaulted Naresh by farsa causing injury on head while Bhagirath assaulted Naresh by stone causing injury on hand, thereafter Ranjan and Ravindra assaulted Mithilesh by kudal and lathi and Ashok assaulted Babita on chest and other part of the body by lathi while Mukesh Rajak assaulted Mukesh Kumar by lathi. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners have been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant, it is next submitted that from perusal of the allegation as alleged in the FIR it would manifest that no specific allegation of assault is alleged against petitioner no. 1, though petitioner no. 2 is alleged to have assaulted Naresh by farsa on head while petitioner no. 3 is alleged to have assaulted Mithilesh by kudal and petitioner no. 4 is alleged to have assaulted Mithilesh by lathi but then the injury report is not on record nor the order impugned records about the injury suffered by them. It is also submitted that on account of dispute relating to land the occurrence is alleged to have taken place. It is next Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.16529 of 2026(2) dt.07-04-2026 3/3 submitted that the order impugned with regard to the injury suffered by the informant has wrongly recorded the name of the informant as Manish. 5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners. 6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the parties, the petitioners, in the event of their arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Barhat P.S. Case No. 166 of 2025 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the BNSS. Gaurav Sinha/- (Satyavrat Verma, J) U T