Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 66042 (MAD)

T.N.Jayaraman v. The District Collector

WP/3333/2026 · 2026-02-09

Abdul Quddhose

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

WP No. 3333 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 09-02-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE WP No. 3333 of 2026 T.N.Jayaraman ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The District Collector Perambalur , Perambalur district 2. The District Revenue officer Perambalur , Perambalur district 3. The Revenue Divisional officer/ Sub Collector Perambalur , Perambalur district 4. The Tahsildar Veppanthattai taluk office, Veppanthattai and Taluk, Perambalur District 5. N.Kasi ..Respondent(s) Writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking for issuance of a writ of mandamus to direct the 2nd respondent to dispose of the Appeal filed by the petitioner against the proceedings A2/ 356/ 2025 dated 25.04.2025 on the file of the 3rd respondent. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 3333 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 For Petitioner(s): Mr.R.Rajarajan For Respondent(s): Mr.S.Arumugam, GA ORDER The petitioner seeks for a limited relief. The petitioner seeks for early disposal of his appeal dated 20.05.2025 pending on the file of the second respondent. 2. Mr.S.Arumugam, learned Government Advocate, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents 1 to 4. Since no adverse orders are passed against the fifth respondent, notice to the fifth respondent in this writ petition is dispensed with. 3. No prejudice will be caused to the second respondent if the petitioner’s appeal dated 20.05.2025 is considered on merits and in accordance with law, after hearing the objections of the fifth respondent, and also by adhering to the principles of natural justice. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of by directing the second respondent to dispose of the petitioner’s appeal dated 20.05.2025, on merits and in accordance with law, after hearing the objections of the fifth respondent and any other party whom the second respondent deems fit to enquire, and also by adhering to the principles of natural justice, within a https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 3333 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4 period of 12 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. This Court is not expressing any opinion on the merits of the petitioner’s appeal dated 20.05.2025. No Costs. 09-02-2026 Neutral Citation: Yes/No RKM To 1. The District Collector Perambalur , Perambalur district 2. The District Revenue officer Perambalur , Perambalur district 3. the Revenue Divisional officer/ Sub Collector Perambalur , Perambalur district 4. the Tahsildar Veppanthattai taluk office, Veppanthattai and Taluk, Perambalur District https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 3333 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J. RKM WP No. 3333 of 2026 09-02-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis