Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 66029 (MAD)

M.Seerangan v. The District collector

WP/2372/2026 · 2026-01-29

Abdul Quddhose

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

WP No. 2372 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 29-01-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE WP No. 2372 of 2026 M.Seerangan ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The District collector, Dharmapuri-636 705 2. The District Revenue officer(DRO) 1st floor, The Collectorate Dharmapuri-636 705 3. The Tahsildar, Pennagaram Taluk Dharmapuri District 4. The Village Administrative officer Arakkasanahalli Revenue village, Pennagaram Taluk Dharmapuri District ..Respondent(s) Writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking for issuance of a writ of mandamus to direct the second respondent herein to consider the petitioner’s representation dated 02.09.2025, conduct an appropriate enquiry in accordance with law, and pass a reasoned order thereon including effecting necessary correction in patta No.454 relating to Arakkasanahalli Village, Pennagaram Taluk, Dharmapuri District within a time frame to be fixed by this Court. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 2372 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 For Petitioner(s): Mr.C.Palanisamy For Respondent(s): Mr.R.P.Murugan Raja, GA ORDER This writ petition has been filed seeking for a direction to the second respondent to carry out a correction in patta No.454 for the property morefully described in the prayer to this writ petition, based on the petitioner’s representation dated 02.09.2025, within a time frame to be fixed by this Court. 2. Patta No.454, referred to supra, stands in the name of the petitioner’s father. According to the petitioner, the said patta needs to be corrected. He had given a representation dated 02.09.2025 to the second respondent to carry out a correction in Patta No.454. Since the said representation has not been considered till date, the petitioner has filed this writ petition. 3. Mr.R.P.Murugan Raja, learned Government Advocate, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. 4. No prejudice will be caused to the respondents if the aforesaid representation of the petitioner is considered, on merits and in accordance with law, after giving due consideration to the supporting documents filed by the https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 2372 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4 petitioner. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of by directing the second respondent to pass final orders, on merits and in accordance with law, on the petitioner’s representation dated 02.09.2025 seeking for a correction in Patta No.454, for the subject property, after giving due consideration to the supporting documents filed by him, within a period 12 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. This Court is not expressing any opinion on the merits of the aforesaid representation of the petitioner. No Costs. 29-01-2026 Neutral Citation: Yes/No RKM To 1. The District collector Dharmapuri District, Dharmapuri-636 705 2. The District Revenue officer(DRO) 1st floor, The Collectorate Dharmapuri-636 705 3. The Tahsildare Pennagaram Taluk office, Pennagaram Taluk Dharmapuri District Pincode-636 810 4. The Village Administrative officer Arakkasanahalli Revenue village, Pennagaram Taluk Dharmapuri District https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 2372 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J. RKM WP No. 2372 of 2026 29-01-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis