Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 6597 (UTT)

RUCHIKA v. SUMIT NEGI

WPMS/1486/2026 · 2026-06-08

Manoj Kumar Tiwari

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:UHC:4517 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS WPMS/1486/2026 Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J. Mr. Nishant Krishna Adhikari, Advocate for the petitioner. 2. Office report indicates that notice was duly served upon respondent, however, there is no representation for the respondent. 3. According to petitioner, she along with her husband had moved a petition for divorce by mutual consent under Section 27(1) of Uniform Civil Code, Uttarakhand, 2024. It is the case of the petitioner that she now wants to withdraw her consent and she moved an application in that regard, but that application was not entertained by the court concerned. 4. The contention raised on behalf of the petitioner cannot be accepted that the court concerned is not accepting the application alleged to have been made by the petitioner. 5. The writ petition, however, is disposed of with liberty to petitioner to file appropriate application before the court concerned. The court concerned shall entertain that application and pass appropriate order, as per law. (Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.) 08.06.2026 Navin