[2026:RJ-JP:12989] sHIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Appeal (SB) No. 198/2026 Yusuf S/o Israeel, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Jakhopur Dhoj, Police Station, Sector 58, Faridabad, Haryana. (At Present Confined In Central Jail Jaipur) ----Appellant Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through The P.P. -----Respondent 2. Pyare Lal S/o Sh. Mool Chand Balai, R/o Pawana Ahir, Sarund, District Jaipur Rural (Raj.) ----Complainant For Appellant(s) : Mr. Rahul Sinsinwar, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vijay Singh Yadav, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 27/03/2026 1. The instant appeal has been filed under Section 14(A)(2) of SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act being aggrieved of the order dated 16.01.2026 passed by learned Special Judge, SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Cases, Jaipur District, Jaipur in Second Bail Application No.12/2026 rejecting the bail application preferred on behalf of the appellant, who is in custody in connection with FIR No.193/2022 registered at Police Station Chandwaji, District Jaipur Rural for offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 427, 341, 323 & 307 of IPC and Sections 3(1)(r), 3(1)(s) & 3(2) (va) of SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (Amendment 2015). After completion of investigation, police filed charge-sheet in this matter. [2026:RJ-JP:12989] (2 of 3) [CRLAS-198/2026] 2. It is contended by learned counsel for the appellant that appellant has falsely been implicated in this case. Learned counsel submits that co-accused person namely, Virendra Singh @ Viru @ Anu has already been granted benefit of bail by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court. He further submits that injuries sustained by injured persons namely, Pyare Lal and Satpal Yadav are simple in nature. He argues that there are no criminal antecedents against the appellant and trial of the case will take considerable time in its conclusion. He contends that appellant is in custody since 12.12.2025 and further custody of the appellant would not serve any fruitful purpose. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor opposes the prayer for bail made in this appeal. He submits that complainant/victim of this case has been duly informed about hearing of this criminal appeal. 4. Despite information, no one has appeared on behalf of the complainant/respondent No.2. 5. Heard. Perused the material available on record. 6. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the appellant, especially the fact that co-accused namely, Virendra Singh @ Viru @ Anu has been granted benefit of bail by a Co- ordinate Bench of this Court; charge-sheet has been filed; absence of criminal antecedents and trial will take considerable time in its conclusion as well as looking to the period of custody, but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of this [2026:RJ-JP:12989] (3 of 3) [CRLAS-198/2026] case, this Court deems it just and proper to enlarge the appellant on bail. 7. Consequently, the instant Criminal Appeal is allowed. The impugned order dated 16.01.2026 passed by learned Special Judge, SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Cases, Jaipur District, Jaipur is set aside. It is ordered that the accused-appellant- Yusuf S/o Israeel arrested in connection with aforesaid FIR No.193/2022 registered at Police Station Chandwaji, District Jaipur Rural shall be released on bail, if not wanted in any other case, provided he shall furnish a personal bond of Rs.1,00,000/- and two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court with the stipulation to appear before that Court on all dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 8. The observations made hereinabove are only for decision of the instant criminal appeal and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J MADAN/74