Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 65928 (MAD)

P.Aadhilakshmi v. District collector

WP/3133/2026 · 2026-02-03

C Kumarappan, S M Subramaniam

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

WP No. 3133 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 03-02-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S. M. SUBRAMANIAM AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN WP No. 3133 of 2026 and WMP.No.3519 of 2026 P.Aadhilakshmi ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The District Collector, Kanchipuram District, Kanchipuram-631 501. 2. The Tahsildar, Kunrathur Taluk Kunrathur, Chennai-600 069. 3. The Assistant Divisional Engineer (State Highways) Tambaram Division, Chennai-600 042 ..Respondent(s) Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking issuance of certiorarified mandamus, calling for records of the 3rd respondent in Letter bearing No.324/ Aakiramippu/ 2025 / E.Ni.U dated 07.01.2026 to vacate the petitioner from petition premises within 14 days from the date of said order and to quash the same. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 3133 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 For Petitioner(s): Mr.V.Seshachari For Respondent(s): Mr.T.Arun Kumar Additional Government Pleader for R1 to R3 ORDER (Order of the Court was made by C.Kumarappan J.) The present Writ Petition has been filed assailing the order of the Assistant Executive Engineer dated 07.01.2026. On perusal of such notice, it is seen that the notice was issued under Section 28 of the Tamil Nadu Highways Act, 2001. It is settled principle of law that no writ is maintainable against the issuance of notice unless such issuance of notice is by an incompetent authority. 2. In this case, it is not the case of the petitioner that the notice was issued by an incompetent authority. Therefore, we deem it appropriate to give liberty to the petitioner to reply to the authority concerned. However, the learned counsel for the petitioner submit that the petitioner has already given explanation on 10.01.2026. 3. In view of the above fact, the Authorities are directed to consider the above reply and thereafter, take a decision in accordance with law. If any encroachments are identified then, all encroachments on Highway properties are to be removed and enforcement actions to be continued. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 3133 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4 4. This Writ Petition stands dismissed with the above observations. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. (S.M.S.,J.) (C.K.,J.) 03-02-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No KKN To 1. The District Collector, Kanchipuram District, Kanchipuram-631 501. 2. The Tahsildar, Kunrathur Taluk Kunrathur, Chennai-600 069. 3. The Assistant Divisional Engineer (State Highways) Tambaram Division, Chennai-600 042 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 3133 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J. AND C.KUMARAPPAN, J. KKN WP No. 3133 of 2026 03-02-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis