LOKENDRA SINGH S/O LATE SHRI MADAN MOHAN SINGH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
/114/2026 · 2026-03-19
Anand Sharma
Contempt Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 6591 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 6591 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:11898] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 114/2026 Lokendra Singh S/o Late Shri Madan Mohan Singh, Aged About 35 Years, R/o House No. 17, Azad Nagar, 60 Feet Road, Alwar (Rajasthan). ----Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Principal Secretary, Department Of Education, Government Secretariat, Jaipur (Rajasthan).
2. Krishna Kunal, Principal Secretary, Department Of Education, Government Secretariat, Jaipur (Rajasthan).
3. Mahesh Mehta, The District Education Officer (Headquarter), Alwar (Rajasthan).
4. Maniram Gurjar, The Urban Chief Elementary Education Officer, Government Senior Secondary School, Railways Station, Alwar (Rajasthan).
5. Devendra Singh Choudhary, The District Education Officer (Headquarter), Elementary Education, Alwar (Rajasthan). ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Prashant Vijay Mr. Shashank Mr. Yatin Kumar Mr. Rohit Choudhary For Respondent(s) : Mr. S.S. Naruka with Ms. Ritika Naruka HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA
Order 19/03/2026
1. This contempt petition has been filed by the petitioner alleging non-compliance of order dated 19.11.2025 in S.B. CWP No.7728/2024 titled as "Lokendra Singh Vs. The State of Rajasthan & Ors.", whereby liberty was granted to the
[2026:RJ-JP:11898] (2 of 2) [CCP-114/2026] petitioner to submit a representation before the competent authority with further direction to the authority to decide a representation.
2.
Learned counsel appearing for the respondents, at the outset, submitted that in compliance of order dated 19.11.2025 passed by this Court, representation filed by the petitioner has been decided vide order dated 17.03.2026. Order is taken on record.
3. In view of the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioners, no case of wilfull and deliberate disobedience is made out, hence the contempt petition is dismissed.
4. Notices stand discharged.
5. It is made clear that mere dismissal of the contempt petition will not take away rights to challenge the order dated 17.03.2026 before the appropriate Court.
6. Pending application(s), if any, stands dismissed.
(ANAND SHARMA),J RINCHU /70