Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 6588 (JHR)

SAMIR ANSARI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./2979/2026 · 2026-04-17

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

( 2026:JHHC:11178 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 2979 of 2026 ------ Samir Ansari, aged about 20 years, S/o Mohhmad Mustak Ansari, R/o Village –Gandhi Nagar, Bicha, Deoria Bargaon, Bhurkunda, P.O. –Bhurkunda, P.S. –Bhurkunda, O.P. – Patratu, District –Ramgarh, Jharkhand. … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Ranish Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mrs. Amrita Kumari, Addl. P.P. ------ Order No.02 Dated- 17.04.2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has moved this Court for grant of bail in connection with Namkum P.S. Case No.217 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under sections 310(2) and 311 of the B.N.S., 2023. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner along with the co-accused persons being armed with deadly weapons entered into the premises of the Grid Sub-Station, Namkum, Ranchi and committed theft of copper strips, flexible bonds, cables, connectors and other valuable electrical equipment worth Rs.17,00,000/-. It is further submitted that the allegations against the petitioner are all false and the petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. It is next submitted that the petitioner has not been put on Test Identification Parade as has been mentioned in para -13 of the bail application. It is next submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 10.02.2026, as has been mentioned in paragraph no. 16 of the bail application. It is further submitted that the petitioner undertakes to cooperate with the trial of the case and further undertakes that he will not annoy or disturb the informant or the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be admitted to bail. The learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above, I am inclined to enlarge the above-named petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate -1st Class, Ranchi, in connection with Namkum P.S. Case No.217 of 2025 with the condition that the petitioner will co-operate with the trial of the case and will furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case, with further condition that he will not annoy or disturb the informant or the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) 17.04.2026 Sonu/