Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 6587 (CHH)

DIL SAI KISAPOTA v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPC/1426/2026 · 2026-04-14

Shri Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:17090 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 1426 of 2026 Dil Sai Kisapota S/o Porga Kisapota Aged About 55 Years Caste- Uraon (St), R/o Village- Chandrapur, Tehsil- Chandrapur, District- Sakti, Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner. versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary Department Of Revenue And Disaster Management, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, New Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2 - Secretary Department Of Water Resource, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, New Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 3 - Collector District- Sakti, Chhattisgarh. 4 - Sub Divisional Officer (R) Cum Land Acquisition Officer Dabhara District- Sakti, Chhattisgarh. 5 - Executive Engineer W.R.D. Kalma Bairaj, Raigarh Division Raigarh, District- Raigarh, Chhattisgarh. ... Respondents. (cause title downloaded from CIS Periphery) For Petitioner : Mr. Pranjal Agrawal, Advocate. For Respondents : Mr. Amit Nayak, Panel Lawyer. (Hon’ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi ) Order on Board 15/04/2026 1. Heard. Digitally signed by AJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI DN: cn=AJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI, ou=HIGH COURT, o=HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, st=Chhattisgarh, c=IN Date: 2026.04.16 10:23:08 +0530 2 2. It is submitted by counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is the owner of the land bearing Khasra No.980/1 area 0.18 acre situated at village Chandrapur, Tehsil Chandrapur, District Sakti (C.G.). After the construction of Kalma Bairaj, the portion of the agricultural land of the petitioner in all the cases have come under submergence area of the Bairaj. Acquisition proceedings with respect to the land under submergence have not been drawn, with respect to the land of the petitioner. Therefore, it is prayed that a specific direction be issued to the respondent Authorities to initiate the acquisition proceedings and grant compensation to the petitioner. 3. Learned State counsel submits that the petition may be disposed of with appropriate direction. 4. After considering on the submissions and perusing the documents filed alongwith the petition, this petition is disposed of at motion stage granting liberty to the petitioner to file fresh representation before the respondent Authorities within a period of 15 days starting from today. After filing of such representation by the petitioner, the respondent Authorities are directed to verify the claims made by the petitioner, to initiate acquisition proceeding, if necessary, and also determine the compensation in favour of the petitioner in case the land of the petitioner comes under the submergence area of the Kalma Bairaj, by the respondent Authorities within a period of 90 days. 5. With the aforesaid observations, this petition is disposed of. Sd/- (Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi) Judge Ajay