Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 6582 (JHR)

SAHDEO MAHTO @ SAHADEO MAHTO v. STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./1719/2026 · 2026-04-17

Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:11070 --1-- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI A.B.A. No. 1719 of 2026 ---- 1. Sahdeo Mahto @ Sahadeo Mahto, S/o Late Khublal Mahto, aged 55 years, R/o Parwatpur, PO – Senadoni, PS and District – Giridih 2. Birendra Verma @ Birendra Prasad Verma, S/o Ganesh Prasad Verma, aged 36 years, R/o Panchayat Chongakhar, village – Dudhiyano, PO – Karma, PS – Birni and District - Giridih .... Petitioners -- Versus -- The State of Jharkhand .... Opposite Party ---- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI --- For the Petitioners :- Mr. Yogesh Modi, Advocate For the State :- Mr. Rakesh Kr. Sinha, Advocate For the Informant :- Mr. Naresh Pd. Thakur, Advocate ---- 02/17.04.2026 The matter relates to Giridih (M) P.S. Case No.201 of 2025 (G.R. 2217/25) pending in the Court of learned SDJM, Giridih. 2. It appears that under misconception the present anticipatory bail application has been filed as the petitioner has already been granted regular bail by the order dated 15.07.2025. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the State and Informant accepts that the anticipatory bail application was not required to file as the regular bail was already granted. 4. Considering that under misconception the present anticipatory bail application has been filed this petition is disposed of. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Dated 17.04.2026 Sangam/