Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 658 (RAJ)

RAMSWAROOP @ GAJNI S/O LATE SHRI UGMA RAM JAT v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/3387/2026 · 2026-03-12

Pramil Kumar Mathur

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:10436] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 3387/2026 Ramswaroop @ Gajni S/o Late Shri Ugma Ram Jat, R/o Mahavir Colony, Sanwatsar, Police Station, Gandhi Nagar, District Ajmer, At Present Lodged In The Central Jail, Ajmer. ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ashvin Garg For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Sharma, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 12/03/2026 1. The petitioner has preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.48/2026 registered at Police Station Nasirabad Sadar, District Ajmer for offences under Sections 3 and 25(1-B)(a) of Arms Act, 1959. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He again submits that the police have forcibly and illegally taken him away without informing his parents or relatives. When the petitioner was not found, his mother lodged a complaint regarding his missing status on 06.02.2026. Thereafter on 07.02.2026 the police lodged present FIR against the petitioner on false and fabricated grounds with mala fide intent. Petitioner is behind the bars since 09.02.2026 [2026:RJ-JP:10436] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-3387/2026] with seven cases as criminal antecedents out of which three cases have been disposed with order of acquittal in two cases. The trial of the case will take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in further custody, consequently the bail application deserves to be allowed. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. 5. On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and in light of submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner. 6. Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that the petitioner Ramswaroop @ Gajni S/o Late Shri Ugma Ram Jat, be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial with following further conditions:- (i) that the petitioner shall mark his presence before the SHO, Police Station Nasirabad Sadar, District Ajmer in every 15 days of each month till conclusion of trial. (ii) The concerned SHO is directed to maintain a register for this purpose. In case, the petitioner fails [2026:RJ-JP:10436] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-3387/2026] to mark his presence in the concerned Police Station as directed above, the concerned SHO is directed to immediately report the matter to trial court in this regard. (iii) The petitioner shall not repeat any offence in future. (iv) If breach of any of the directions is reported or come to the notice of the trial court the same shall alone be a reason for learned Public Prosecutor to apply for cancellation of bail and trial court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Chandan/31