Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 6576 (AP)

M SUNDARA RAGHAVAMMA v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/21037/2026 · 2026-07-27

Maheswara Rao Kuncheam

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010393202026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE 28th DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 21037 OF 2026 Between: 1. M SUNDARA RAGHAVAMMA, W/o. late Mangalagiri Singaraiah aged 87 years, Occ. House Wife, R/ o.Mallavolu(V), Machavaram(M), Palnadu District 522231 ...Petitioner AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, rep by its Principal Secretary, Home Dept., Secretariat, Velagapudi, Guntur-522331 2. Director General of Police, Mangalagiri, Guntur. 522503 3. Inspector General of Police, Guntur Range, Guntur. 522001 4. Superintendent of Police, Narasaraopet, Palnadu Dist. ,522014 5. Deputy Superintendent of Police, Gurazala Divission, Gurazala, Palnadu Dist., 014 6. Circle Inspector of Police, Dachepalli P.S., Dachepalli, Guntur District. 522214 7. Sub Inspector of Police, Machavaram P.S., Machavaram(V and M), Palnadu District. 522214 8. M Srinivasa Rao, S/o. Singaraiah, aged 48 years, Occ. Gold Appraiser R/o.Mallavolu(V), Machavaram(M), Palnadu District 522231 9. Keertipati Pavan Kumar, S I of Police, Machavaram Police Station, Machavaram, Palnadu District. 522231 2 ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ/Order/Direction more particularly one in the Nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in interfering with civil disputes besides forcing the petitioner to withdraw Appeal pending before Collector, Palnadu District as illegal, arbitrary, without jurisdiction besides violation of Art. 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents not to interfere with family disputes by the 7th respondent in an illegal means by misusing the powers vests with him and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 4th Respondent to collect CC Footage of 7th Respondent Police Station on 20.07.26 and 27.07.26 on which dates kept my second under illegal detention to proceed further forthwith pending disposal of the Writ Petition and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: J JAYANAND Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 21037 of 2026 The Court made the following Order: Instant Writ Petition has been filed by the petitioner under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief: “.... to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in interfering with civil disputes besides forcing the petitioner to withdraw Appeal pending before Collector, Palnadu District as illegal, arbitrary, without jurisdiction besides violation of Art. 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents not to interfere with family disputes by the 7th respondent in an illegal means by misusing the powers vests with him and pass such other order or orders …”. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is a widow aged about 87 years and the unofficial respondent No.8 is petitioner’s son. Main assertion of the petitioner is that the respondent police are harassing the petitioner, without there being any legal cause. 4. On the other hand, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home basing on the Written Instructions of the Station House Officer, Machavaram Police Station, Palnadu District dated 28.07.2026 submits that 8th respondent’s wife lodged FIR in 4 Crime No.51 of 2026 of Machavaram Police Station, Palnadu District for the offences punishable under Section 118(1), 351(2) and 79 read with Section 3(5) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhitha, 2023 and with a view to investigate into the said crime, respondent/police called the petitioner’s son to the police station and they never called the petitioner to the police station. 5. Written Instructions of the Station House Officer, Machavaram Police Station, Palnadu District dated 28.07.2026 is made part of the record. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, respondent/police are directed not to interfere with the personal life and liberty of the petitioner without any legal cause. 7. Needless to state that the respondent police may go on with the investigation in FIR in Crime No.51 of 2026 of Machavaram Police Station, Palnadu District, in accordance with the law. 8. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of. Interlocutory applications, if any, pending shall stand closed. ____________________________________ JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM Date: 28.07.2026 Note: Issue C.C. by 29.07.2026 B/o. PSA 5 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 21037 of 2026 Date: 28.07.2026 Note: Issue C.C. by 29.07.2026 B/o. PSA