Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:10942 WP No. 3342 of 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 3342 OF 2026 (LB-RES) BETWEEN:
SRI. CHANDRASHEKHARA S/O ANNU POOJARI, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, R/AT PORKALA HOUSE, PUTHILA VILLAGE BARYA GRAMA PANCHAYAT, BELTHANGADY TALUK, DAKSHINA KANNADA DISTRICT -574236 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. MADHUKESHWARA R P.,ADVOCATE) AND:
1.
THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER PUTTUR SUB-DIVISION, PUTTUR DAKSHINA KANNADA DISTRICT - 574 201.
2.
THE TAHSILDAR, BELTHANGADY TALUK, BELTHANGADY DAKSHINA KANNADA DISTRICT - 574 214.
3.
THE PRESIDENT, BARYA VILLAGE PANCHAYAT, BARYA VILLAGE, BELTHANGADY TALUK,
Digitally signed by SHWETHA RAGHAVENDRA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:10942 WP No. 3342 of 2026
DAKSHINA KANNADA DISTRICT - 574 326. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. BOPPANNA BELLIYAPPA, AGA)
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITTUION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT R1, 2 AND 3 TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATIONS DATED 30.12.2025, 30.092025 AND 09.07.2025 RESPECTIVELY AS PRODUCED AT ANNX-C AND B.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ
ORAL ORDER
1. Learned Additional Government Advocate accepts notice for respondent Nos.1 and 2.
2. Sri. Sharanjith Shetty, learned counsel is directed to accept notice for respondent No.3.
3. Petitioner is before this Court seeking for the following reliefs: a. Issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ,
order or direction directing respondent Nos.1, 2 and 3 to consider the representations dated 30.12.2025, 30.09.2025 and 09.07.2025 respectively, as produced at Annexure-C and B;
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:10942 WP No. 3342 of 2026
b. Issue any other writ or order to direction that this Hon'ble court deems fit to grant in the circumstances of the case in the interest of justice and equity.
4. The grievance of the petitioner is that the representations submitted by the petitioner on 30.12.2025, 30.09.2025 and 09.07.2025 to maintain the road, which has been formed and carry out the repairs so as to provide a proper access to their property has not been considered by the respondents.
5. Whenever, any representation is submitted to a government authority, it is required for the authority to consider the same and pass orders within a reasonable period of time either by accepting or rejecting the said representations.
6. Needless to say, if any order passed, the same would have to be accompanied by reasons. In the present matter, neither having been done and the representations having been kept pending, I pass the following:
ORDER i) Writ petition is allowed.
- 4 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:10942 WP No. 3342 of 2026
ii) A mandamus is issued directing respondent Nos.1 to 3 to consider the representations dated 30.12.2025, 30.09.2025 and 09.07.2025, respectively, at Annexures-C and B, and pass necessary orders within a period of thirty days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. iii) It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the entitlement of the petitioner.
SD/- (SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) JUDGE
GJM List No.: 2 Sl No.: 26