Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 6571 (RAJ)

POOJA SAINI D/O SHRI RAMKISHOR SAINI, WIFE OF SHRI VISHNU KUMAR BANJARA, v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLW/261/2026 · 2026-02-19

Bhuwan Goyal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:7971] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 261/2026 1. Pooja Saini D/o Shri Ramkishor Saini, Wife Of Shri Vishnu Kumar Banjara, Aged About 19 Years, Resident Of Dhulravji Dani Sankotda Ki, Post Dhulravji, Jaipur, District Jaipur (Raj.) At Present Resident Of Arniya, Sawai Madhopur, District Sawai Madhopur (Raj.) 2. Vishnu Kumar Banjara Son Of Shri Prabhu, Aged About 26 Years, Resident Of Arniya, Sawai Madhopur, District Sawai Madhopur (Raj.) ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p. 2. Superintendent Of Police, Jaipur Rural, Jaipur (Raj.) 3. Nodal Officer, Police Station Jamwa Ramgarh, District Jaipur Rural (Raj.) 4. S.h.o. Police Station Jamwa Ramgarh, District Jaipur Rural (Raj.) 5. Raju Son Of Late Shri Ramchandra, Resident Of Shamshant Ghat Chauraha, Near Mittal Hospital, Alwar, District Alwar (Raj.) 6. Ramphool Gurjar Son Of Not Known, Resident Of Heerawala, Jamwa Ramgarh, Ralwas Mod, Jaipur. 7. Guddi Saini Wife Of Shri Ramphool Gurjar, Resident Of Dularavji, Sankotra Ki Dhani, Dausa (Raj.) 8. Rajesh Son Of Shri Ramkishor Saini, Resident Of Dhularavji Dani Sankotda Ki, Post Dhularavji, Jaipur District Jaipur (Raj.) 9. Lalchand Son Of Shri Ramkishor Saini, Resident Of Dhularavji Dani Sankotda Ki, Post Dhularavji, Jaipur District Jaipur (Raj.) 10. Makkhan Lal Son Of Shri Ramkishor Saini, Resident Of Dhularavji Dani Sankotda Ki, Post Dhularavji, Jaipur District Jaipur (Raj.) 11. Bablu Son Of Shri Ramkishor Saini, Resident Of Dhularavji Dani Sankotda Ki, Post Dhularavji, Jaipur District Jaipur (Raj.) [2026:RJ-JP:7971] (2 of 3) [CRLW-261/2026] 12. Ramkishor Saini Son Of Shri Bhagwan Sahay Saini, Resident Of Dhularavji Dani Sankotda Ki, Post Dhularavji, Jaipur District Jaipur (Raj.) 13. Shanti Devi Wife Of Shri Ramkishor Saini, Resident Of Dhularavji Dani Sankotda Ki, Post Dhularavji, Jaipur District Jaipur (Raj.) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Santosh Srivastava, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Choudhary, Dy.G.A. Mr. Shubham Sain, AAAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BHUWAN GOYAL Order 19/02/2026 1. Defects pointed out by the Registry are overruled. 2. This criminal writ petition has been filed by petitioners seeking protection from the private respondent Nos. 5 to 13 as they are apprehending danger to their life and liberty at the hands of private respondents. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that both the petitioners are major to take decision of their life. He submits that petitioners solemnized their marriage on 13.06.2025. In this regard, the petitioners have executed a consent letter duly signed by both the parties and attested by the Notary Public. A copy of consent letter dated 22.01.2026 has been annexed with the petition. Counsel further submits that petitioners are living peacefully as husband and wife but respondent Nos. 5 to 13 are not happy with their marriage and petitioners are receiving continuous threats from the private respondents, so they have prayed for protection. [2026:RJ-JP:7971] (3 of 3) [CRLW-261/2026] 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners has placed reliance upon the judgment passed by the Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of Lata Singh Vs. State of U.P. reported in AIR 2006 SC 2522. 5. Learned Deputy Government Advocate has opposed the same. 6. Both the petitioners are present in person today in the court. Their signature have been obtained on the court’s order sheet and they have been duly identified by their counsel. 7. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioners are directed to file an appropriate application seeking protection before the concerned SHO, who in turn, is directed that if such an application is filed before him, he will provide adequate protection to the petitioners as per law and ensure that no harm is caused to them. 8. The Criminal Writ Petition is, accordingly, disposed of. 9. Stay application and pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of. 10. However, it is made clear that this order will not affect other civil/ criminal proceedings, if any pending in the present matter. (BHUWAN GOYAL),J Gourav/124