Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 6569 (CAL)

TANIYA KHATUN v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

WPA/1711/2026 · 2026-02-11

Saugata Bhattacharyya

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

18. 18. (DL) (DL) 11.02.2026 11.02.2026 Ct. No. 02 (ARPAN) IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction (Appellate Side) W.P.A. 1711 OF 2026 TANIYA KHATUN VS. THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL & OTHERS Mr. Maidul Islam, Adv. Mr. Anisur Rahman, Adv. Mr. Archisman Singh, Adv. Mr. Noorul Amin Sardar, Adv. …for the Petitioner Mr. Rajarshi Basu, Adv. Mr. K.M. Hossain, Adv. …for the State 1. At the time of call it is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that petitioner does not want to press this writ petition. 2. State respondents are represented by learned advocates. 3. Considering the submission made on behalf of the petitioner, writ petition stands dismissed as not pressed. 4. Parties to act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this court. (SAUGATA BHATTACHARYYA, J.)