Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010043312026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/1566/2026 SRI DIPAK KR. PATGIRI AND ANR SON OF HAW RAM RAY ALIAS HAWRAM PATGIRI, RESIDENT OF VILL- BARBILA, P.O.- MANIKPUR, DIST- BONGAIGAON, PIN-783392 2: SMT RASHMI RAY WIFE OF LT. LANKESWAR RAY ALIAS LAKHESWAR RAY RESIDENT OF VILL- BARBILA P.O.- MANIKPUR DIST- BONGAIGAON PIN-78339 VERSUS THE UNION OF INDIA AND 6 ORS REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF INDIA MINISTRY OF ROAD TRANSPORT AND HIGHWAYS, GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, TRANSPORT BHAWAN, 1, PARLIAMENT STREET, NEW DELHI - 110001. 2:THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM REVENUE SETTLEMENT DEPARTMENT DISPUR GUWAHATI-781006 ASSAM. 3:THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER BONGAIGAON P.O AND DIST-- BONGAIGAON PIN-- 783380 ASSAM. 4:THE NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY OF INDIA (NHAI) (MINISTRY OF ROAD TRANSPORT AND HIGHWAY) Page No.# 2/3 HQ G-5 AND 6 SECTOR-10 DWARAKA NEW DELHI-110075. 5:GENERAL MANAGER (FINANCE) NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY OF INDIA HQ G-5 AND 6 SECTOR-10 DWARAKA NEW DELHI-110075 6:PROJECT DIRECTOR NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY OF INDIA NHAI BONGAIGAON P.O- AND DISTRICT--BONGAIGAON PIN-- 783380 ASSAM. 7:THE CIRCLE OFFICER BIJNI REVENUE CIRCLE BONGAIGAON P.O-BIJNI DISTRICT-- BONGAIGAON PIN- 783390 ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR S C DAS, D R BONGSHIARY,P BURAGOHAIN Advocate for the Respondent : DY.S.G.I., GA, ASSAM,SC, NHAI,SC, REVENUE BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANISH CHOUDHURY ORDER Date : 15-05-2026 Heard Ms. D.R. Bongshiary, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Mr. S.C. Das, learned counsel for the petitioners; Ms. A. Gayan, learned CGC for the respondent no. 1; Ms. N. Bordoloi, learned Standing Counsel, Revenue Department for the respondent no. 2; Mr. H.K. Hazarika, learned Junior Government Advocate, Assam for the respondent no. 3; and Ms. R. Bora, Page No.# 3/3 learned Standing Counsel, NHAI for the respondent nos. 4, 5 & 6. Ms. Bongshiary, learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the petitioners may be allowed to withdraw the writ petition, with the liberty, to file afresh with proper details. In view of the above submission made by Ms. Bongshiary, the writ petition is dismissed on withdrawal, with the liberty, as prayed for. JUDGE Comparing Assistant