Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 65633 (MAD)

J.GOVINDASAMY v. The Tahsildar

WP/2393/2026 · 2026-01-30

Abdul Quddhose

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

WP No. 2393 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 30-01-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE WP No. 2393 of 2026 J.Govindasamy ..Petitioner(s) Vs The Tahsildar Vembakkam Taluk, Vembakkam -604410 Thiruvannamalai District. ..Respondent(s) directing the respondent to take appropriate action on the petitioners representation dated 13.12.2021 requesting for correction of the mistakes in the Digital patta in respect of the extent of lands owned by him in S.Nos. 140 and 143, Thandappanthangal Revenue Village, Vembakkam Taluk, Thiruvannamalai District and pass orders thereon within a time limit to be fixed by this Honourable Court. For Petitioner(s): Mr.P.Mohanraj For Respondent(s): Mr.D.Ravichander,SGP Order This writ petition has been filed for a mandamus seeking for correction of the mistakes in the digital patta issued in favour of the petitioner for the https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 2393 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 property, morefully described in the prayer to this writ petition, within a time frame to be fixed by this Court. 2.The petitioner had given a representation on 13.12.2021 to the respondent to correct the alleged mistakes in the digital patta issued in his favour for the property, morefully described in the prayer to this writ petition. Since the said representation has not been considered, the petitioner has filed this writ petition. 3.Mr.D.Ravichander, learned Special Government Pleader accepts notice on behalf of the respondent. 4.No prejudice would be caused to the respondent if the petitioner’s representation as stated supra, is considered, on merits and in accordance with law, within a time frame to be fixed by this Court. 5.This Court is not expressing any opinion on the merits of the petitioner’s representation. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 2393 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4 6.For the foregoing reasons, this writ petition is disposed of by directing the respondent to pass final orders, on merits and in accordance with law on the petitioner’s representation dated 13.12.2021 seeking for correction of the mistakes in the digital patta for the property, morefully described in the prayer to this writ petition, after giving due consideration to the documents produced by the petitioner, within a period of 12 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs. 30-01-2026 VGA To The Tahsildar Vembakkam Taluk, Vembakkam -604410 Thiruvannamalai District. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 2393 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 ABDUL QUDDHOSE J. VGA WP No. 2393 of 2026 30-01-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis