Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 6563 (BOM)

RAMKISHAN MURLIDHAR NATVE v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

BA/1685/2026 · 2026-09-03

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

-1- 951-BA-1685-2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1685 OF 2026 RAMKISHAN MURLIDHAR NATVE VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ...... Advocate for Applicant : Mr. G. R. Syed APP for Respondent - State : Mrs. Ashlesha S. Deshmukh ...... CORAM : HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR, J. DATED : 3rd SEPTEMBER 2026 PER COURT : 1. Learned Advocate appearing for applicants submits that, during pendency of present application, charge-sheet has been filed, and therefore he has instructions to withdraw the present application with liberty to file a fresh application before the learned Trial Court. 2. Permission to withdraw is granted with liberty to file a fresh application before the learned Trial Court along with copy of charge-sheet. 3. In case the application is preferred alongwith the charge-sheet then the learned Trial Court decide the same in accordance with law. 4. Bail application is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed. (HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR) JUDGE Tandale 2026:BHC-AUG:40566