PRASANT GHADEI @ PRASANTA GHADEI v. STATE OF ODISHA
ABLAPL/1221/2026 · 2026-03-06
R K Pattanaik
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 656 (ORI) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 656 (ORI) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
ABLAPL No.1221 of 2026
Prasant Ghadei @ Prasanta Ghadei
…. Petitioner Mr. S. K. Rout, Advocate
-Versus-
State of Odisha …. Opposite Party
Mr. M. K. Mohanty, ASC
CORAM:
MR. JUSTICE R.K. PATTANAIK
Order No.
ORDER 06.03.2026
01.
1. Heard learned counsels for the respective parties.
2. Instant petition under Section 482 BNSS is filed for pre-arrest bail of the petitioner in connection with Nandipada P.S. Case No.54 of 2007 corresponding to G.R. Case No.262 of 2007 pending in the file of learned J.M.F.C., Hatadihi on the grounds stated therein.
3. Perused the F.I.R. as at Annexure-1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that some of the accused persons are on bail and refers to an order of this Court dated 4th November, 2024 as at Flag-A5 to claim that the alleged incident is of the year 2007 and there was a mob violence due to sacrifice of a girl child, who was found dead in a paddy field. The further submission is that the petitioner is alleged to be one among the members of mob that committed the alleged mischief causing
damage to a police vehicle. The driver of the vehicle in question lodged the report. Recorded the submission of learned counsel for the State. From the F.I.R. as at Annexure-1, the Court finds that around 1000 people raised protest and committed vandalism and damaged the vehicle which was set ablaze, but from the orders in the ABLAPLs as at Flag-A1 to A5, the Court finds that some of the accused persons were
directed to go on bail. Considering the above facts and
submissions of learned counsel for the respective parties and release of the co-accused persons in the meantime and the fact that the alleged occurrence is about 20 years old and that the investigation must have been concluded long before, this Court is of the view that though the petitioner is not entitled to pre- arrest bail, however, he should be directed to surrender before the learned court below for being released with suitable conditions imposed.
4. Accordingly, it is ordered.
5. In the result, ABLAPL stands disposed of with the direction as aforesaid. It is further directed that upon surrender before the court of learned J.M.F.C., Hatadihi within a fortnight from today, the petitioner shall be released on bail in connection with Nandipada P.S. Case No.54 of 2007 corresponding to G.R. Case No.262 of 2007 subject to him furnishing a bail bond of Rs.30,000/- (Rupees thirty thousand) with one solvent surety for the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned court below, which shall be at liberty to impose
such other suitable conditions as deemed just and proper in the
facts and circumstances of the case.
6. Issue urgent certified copy as per rules.
(R.K. Pattanaik) Judge Sumitra