Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 6558 (GAU)

MUSSTT. MOMINA KHATOON v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 9 ORS.

Crl.L.P./17/2026 · 2026-05-14

Michael Zothankhuma, Sanjeev Kumar Sharma

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010095342026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Crl.L.P./17/2026 MUSSTT. MOMINA KHATOON WIFE OF LATE JAKIR HUSSAIN R/O- PALASHJURI, P.S MOIRABARI, DIST- MORIGAON, ASSAM, PIN -782126. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 9 ORS. REPRESENTED BY THE LEARNED PUBLIC PROSECUTOR OF ASSAM 2:ABDUL KUDDUS S/O- LT. HUSSAIN ALI 3:SHAHJAHAN ALI @ MD SHAHJAHAN S/O- ABDUL RAHMAN @ ABDUR RAHMAN 4:SAIFUL ISLAM S/O- NABAR ALI 5:MOFIJUL ISLAM S/O HABIBULLAH 6:ABDUL SAIAM S/O RAJAB ALI 7:IKRAMUL HOQUE S/O HARIULLAH 8:HARISH ULLAH S/O ABDUL KADIR 9:ABDUL KADIR S/O- HAJI HUSSAIN ALI Page No.# 2/3 10:ASHIK ULLAH S/O- ABDUL KADIR ALL ARE RESIDENTS OF VILLAGE PALAHJURI P.S MOIRABARI DISTRICT MORIGAON ASSAM PIN-782126 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR B M DEKA, M ARIF Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, Linked Case : ST.Rev./0/0 MUSSTT. MOMINA KHATOON WIFE OF LATE JAKIR HUSSAIN R/O- PALASHJURI P.S MOIRABARI DIST-MORIGAON ASSAM PIN- 782126 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 9 ORS. REPRESENTED BY THE LEARNED PUBLIC PROSECUTOR OF ASSAM 2:ABDUL KUDDUS S/O-LT. HUSSAIN ALI 3:SHAHJAHAN ALI @ MD. SHAHJAHAN S/O- ABDUL RAHMAN @ ABDUR RAHMAN 4:SAIFUL ISLAM S/O- NABAR ALI 5:MOFIJUL ISLAM S/O HABIBULLAH 6:ABDUL SALAM S/O RAJAB ALI Page No.# 3/3 7:IKRAMUL HOQUE S/O HARIULLAH 8:HARISH ULLAH S/O ABDUL KADIR 9:ABDUL KADIR S/O- HAJI HUSSAIN ALI 10:ASHIK ULLAH S/O- ABDUL KADIR RESPONDENTS NO.2-10 ARE RESIDENTS OF VILLAGE PALAHJURI P.S MOIRABARI DISTRICT MORIGAON ASSAM PIN-782126. ------------ Advocate for : MR B M DEKA Advocate for : PP ASSAM appearing for THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 9 ORS. BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MICHAEL ZOTHANKHUMA HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV KUMAR SHARMA ORDER Date : 15/05/2026 (Michael Zothankhuma, J) Mr. B.M. Deka, learned counsel for the applicant submits that no leave to appeal needs to be filed by the applicant as the case has originated from an FIR and not on the basis of a complaint. He, accordingly prays that he may be allowed to withdraw the leave petition. The same is allowed. The leave petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Registry to register the appeal and list the matter. JUDGE JUDGE Comparing Assistant