PATHAN CHOUTU, GUNTUR DIST. & 5 OTHRS v. PATHAN SAIBUDDI, GUNTUR DIST. & ANO
CRLRC/1297/2015 · 2026-07-23
Sunitha Gandham
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 6557 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 6557 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010363502015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3604] FRIDAY, THE 24th DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUNITHA GANDHAM CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 1297/2015 Between:
1. PATHAN CHOUTU, GUNTUR DIST. & 5 OTHRS, S/O. SAIDA, RESIDENTS OF KOTHAPALLI VILLAGE, ROMPICHERLA MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT, WITHIN THE LIMITS OF ROMPICHERLA PS LIMITS
2. PATHAN JAITHUMBI, W/O. SAIDA, RESIDENTS OF KOTHAPALLI VILLAGE, ROMPICHERLA MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT, WITHIN THE LIMITS OF ROMPICHERLA PS LIMITS
3. PATHAN SAIDA,, HUSBAND'S NAME NOT KNOWN, RESIDENTS OF KOTHAPALLI VILLAGE, ROMPICHERLA MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT, WITHIN THE LIMITS OF ROMPICHERLA PS LIMITS
4. PATHAN SULTHAN, S/O. SAIDA,
RESIDENTS OF KOTHAPALLI VILLAGE, ROMPICHERLA MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT, WITHIN THE LIMITS OF ROMPICHERLA PS LIMITS
5. PATHAN ESOBI, W/O. SULTAN,
RESIDENTS OF KOTHAPALLI VILLAGE, ROMPICHERLA MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT, WITHIN THE LIMITS OF ROMPICHERLA PS LIMITS
6. MOGHAL BANNACHI, W/O. SRINU, RESIDENTS OF KOTHAPALLI VILLAGE, ROMPICHERLA MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT, WITHIN THE LIMITS OF ROMPICHERLA PS
LIMITS
...PETITIONER(S) AND
1. PATHAN SAIBUDDI GUNTUR DIST ANO, W/O. PATHAN CHOUTU, HOUSE WIFE, R/O.D.NO.9-308/A, KOTHAPALLI VILLAGE, ROMPICHERLA MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT, WITHIN THE LIMITS OF ROMPICHERLA PS LIMITS
2. THE STATE OF A P, REP. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AND THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. G L NAGESWAR RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP)
2. VENKATESWERLLU KESAMSETTY The Court made the following:
THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE SUNITHA GANDHAM
CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO.1297 OF 2015
ORDER:
Learned counsel for the revision petitioners submitted that during the pendency of the present revision, all matrimonial disputes between the parties had been settled out of court.
2.
Learned counsel for the revision petitioner also placed a copy of the judgment dated 14.11.2017 in C.C.No.384 of 2015 passed by the learned II Additional Junior Civil Judge, Narasaraopet. In Paragraph No.16 of the said judgment, it was recorded that during the cross examination of PW.1 to PW.3, they deposed that the matter was settled between both parties. Consequently, the revision petitioners were acquitted of the offences punishable under Sections 498-A and 506 IPC and Sections 3 &4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.
3. In view of the above, learned counsel for the revision petitioners prayed that the revision be dismissed as withdrawn.
4. Permission is accorded.
5. Accordingly, the Criminal Revision Case is dismissed as withdrawn.
3. As a sequel, interlocutory applications pending if any, shall stand closed. _______________________ SUNITHA GANDHAM, J
Date: 24.07.2026. PAB
THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE SUNITHA GANDHAM
CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO.1297 OF 2015
DATE: 24.07.2026
PAB