RAJNE DEVI @ RAJNI AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS
WRIC/36655/2026 · 2026-09-13
Gautam Chowdhary
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 6556 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 6556 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 36655 of 2026 Court No. - 75 HON'BLE DR. GAUTAM CHOWDHARY, J.
1. At the very outset, learned Standing Counsel submits that in the instant case an F.I.R. has already been lodged in Case Crime No. 368 of 2026 under Section 87/352/351(3) of B.N.S. Police Station Deoranian, District Bareilly, and therefore, the instant petition has become infructuous.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioners could not dispute the aforesaid submissions made by learned Standing Counsel.
3. In view of above, the instant petition has become infructuous and is dismissed as having become infructuous.
September 14, 2026 S.Ali Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Arvind Kumar Sahu Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Dr. Gautam Chowdhary,J.) Rajne Devi @ Rajni And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SHAUKAT ALI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad