Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 6555 (KAR)

SMT DIVYA M P v. SMT M NAGARATHNA

WP/18102/2025 · 2026-02-21

Lok Adalath

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE, BENGALURU BEFORE THE LOK ADALAT IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 CONCILIATORS PRESENT: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL & SMT. ARCHANA K.M., MEMBER WRIT PETITION No.18102/2025 (GM - RES) (Lok Adalat No.155/2026) BETWEEN: Smt. Divya M.P. W/o Mr. Sheshadri M.S. Aged about 33 years R/at No.72 C, 4th Main Road Srinivasa Nagar Banashankari 1st Stage Bengaluru - 560 050. ...Petitioner (By Dr. G. Sukumaran, Advocate) AND: 1. Smt. M. Nagarathna W/o late Subramanyam M. Aged about 70 years R/at Ediga Palle Alatturu Karvetinagara Chittor Andhra Pradesh - 51782. Digitally signed by DEEPU M Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA 2 2. Sri. Sheshadri M.S. S/o late Subramanyam M. Aged about 46 years R/at No.74, 2nd Cross, 4th Main Road, Srinivasanagar BSK 1st Stage, Banashankari Bengaluru - 560 050. 3. The Assistant Commissioner (Department Revenue) Bengaluru South Sub Division Bengaluru - 560 001. 4. The Deputy Commissioner Bengaluru Urban District Bengaluru - 560 001. ….Respondents (By Sri. Lakshmikanth K., Advocate for R1; Sri. N. Somashekar, Advocate for R2; AGA for R3 & R4) This Writ Petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of The Constitution of India, praying to quash the proceedings of the Respondent No.1 appeal filed before the Respondent No.4 under Sec.16 of the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 on the file petition in M.A.G.(4)S.C./C.R /65/2024-25 dated 27.02.2025 before the 4th Respondent filed by the Respondent No.1 vide Annexure-D; and etc. 3 This petition coming on for Conciliation before Lok Adalat, the following Conciliation Order is passed: CONCILIATION ORDER 1. Petitioner has filed a Memo for withdrawal of the Writ Petition. The Memo is signed by both the petitioner and the learned counsel representing the petitioner. 2. The said Memo dated 07.02.2026, reads as under: " The petitioner prays that, the above said Writ Petition may be dismissed as not pressed and withdrawn in the interest of justice and equity." 3. Accepting the Memo, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- JUDGE Sd/- MEMBER sac