Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010098132026 2026:GAU-AS:7048 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./1320/2026 SRI PRADIP DAIMARY S/O DANISH DAIMARY, RO BORBARI UPPER BORTILA, H NO 172 OLD, PS DISPUR, DIST KAMRUP (M), ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. K K HANDIQUE, MS M BORA Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE MITALI THAKURIA O R D E R Date : 21.05.2026. Heard Mr. K.K. Handique, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. B. Sarma, learned Addl. P.P., Assam appearing for the State respondent. This is an application under Section 483 of BNSS, 2023 praying for grant of bail to the accused petitioner, namely, Pradip Daimary who has been arrested on 10.05.2026, in connection with Dispur P.S. Case No. 276/2026, under Section 69 Page No.# 2/3 of the BNS, 2023. It is submitted by Mr. Handique, learned counsel for the petitioner that on the plain reading of the FIR itself, it reveals that there no ingredients for an offence under Section 69 of the BNS, 2023 under which the case is registered. The informant continued her relationship, as per the FIR, in spite of the knowledge that the accused petitioner is a married person. However, the accused petitioner is in the custody since 10.05.2026 and thus, considering his length of detention, he may be released on bail. However, the petitioner is ready and willing to extend his cooperation, if it is needed. Mr. B. Sarma, learned Addl. P.P., Assam submits that the case diary will reveal the actual fact of the case. Considering the submission of learned counsel for both sides and perusal of the materials available in the record including the FIR, I deem it to be a fit case to extend the privilege of bail to the present accused petitioner. Accordingly, it is provided that on furnishing a bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees twenty thousand) only with one surety of like amount, to the satisfaction of the learned CJM, Kamrup (M) at Guwahati, the above named accused petitioner may be enlarged on bail, subject to the following conditions: subject to the following conditions: (i) that the petitioner shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer; Page No.# 3/3 (ii) that the petitioner shall not leave the jurisdiction of the learned CJM, Kamrup (M) at Guwahati, without prior permission, and (iii) that the petitioner shall submit copy of his Aadhar Card and PAN Card before the learned Kamrup (M) at Guwahati. In terms of above, this bail application stands allowed and disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant