[2026:RJ-JP:7711] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1231/2026 Sharda Techno Solar Pvt Ltd, 60 Shiv Shakti Nagar, Jaipur (Raj.) Through Director Brijendra Singh Khushwaha S/o Late Shri Chittar Singh Khushwaha, Age 55 Years, R/o 60 Shivshakti Nagar, Kings Road, Indo Bharat School, Jaipur (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary, Department Of Home Affairs, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur- 302005. 2. State Bank Of India, Through Manager, Branch Nirman Nagar, No. A 47, K Towers, Vrindavan Vihar Kings Rd, Nirman Nagar, Jaipur, Rajasthan ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Aditya Matolia For Respondent(s) : Ms. Devakriti Vashishtha, AAAG with Ms. Sunita Meena, AGC and Mr. Kartikeya Shukla for Mr. Bhuwnesh Sharma, AAG Mr. Vikram Singh with Ms. Annika Anna, Ms. Aayushi Jain and Ms. Nidhi Samodia for Ms. Suruchi Kasliwal HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUROOP SINGHI Order 18/02/2026 1. The present writ petition has been filed with the following prayers: “It is therefore, humbly prayed that your lordships may graciously be pleased to accept and allow this writ petition, call for the entire record pertaining to the present matter and after perusal of the same:- I. Issue a writ in the nature of mandamus or any appropriate writ, order, or direction commanding the respondent bank to [2026:RJ-JP:7711] (2 of 3) [CW-1231/2026] immediately unfreeze the current account of the petitioner bearing account no. 43156172676, held with the State bank of India. II. Declare that the action of respondent bank is arbitrary, illegal and violative of article 14, 19(1)(g) and 300A of the Constitution of India. III. Award costs of this petition in the favour of petitioner. IV. Pass such further or other orders as may be deemed just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case. V. Any other appropriate order or direction which is deemed just and proper in the facts and circumstance by this hon’ble court may also be passed in the favor of the petitioner.” 2. Mr. Vikram Singh, Advocate, appearing for Ms. Suruchi Kasliwal, learned counsel for the respondent – State Bank of India, specifically submits that the transaction of Rs.2,77,00,000/- did not pertain to any cyber complaint, which is evident from the additional information mentioned in the complaint dated 02.01.2026. 3. Attention is also drawn to the e-mail (Annexure-4), wherein the Bank has reiterated that there was no fraudulent transaction and that the transaction was carried out by the branch itself. Thus, a request was made to remove the hold of Rs.2,77,00,000/-. 4. Taking note of the aforesaid facts, the respondent – Bank is directed to de-freeze the bank account No.43156172676 of the petitioner maintained at the State Bank of India, Branch Nirman Nagar, forthwith. 5. Accordingly, with the aforesaid directions, the writ petition is allowed. [2026:RJ-JP:7711] (3 of 3) [CW-1231/2026] 6. However, the de-freezing of the account would not have any implication with respect to any dispute qua the said amount by or against the petitioner, and the same be adjudicated and investigated independently, without being influenced by the said direction for de-freezing of the petitioner’s bank account. 7. Needless to say, this order has been passed only in the context of de-freezing of the bank account of the petitioner and in no manner be construed as any determination with respect to the merits or demerits of the case. 8. Pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of accordingly. (ANUROOP SINGHI),J DANISH USMANI /23