TAHIR ANSARI ALIAS BUDHA v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./2927/2026 · 2026-04-10
Anil Kumar Choudhary
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 6550 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 6550 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:JHHC:10531] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No.2927 of 2026
------ Tahir Ansari @ Budha aged about 57 years son of Late Abdul Subhan Ansari, resident of village- Simatand, Kandra, P.O.- Ram Nagar, P.S.- Mahuda, District- Dhanbad.
.... .... …. Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand
.... .... .... Opposite Party
------
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioner : Ms. Pinki Kumari, Advocate
For the State
: Mrs. Anuradha Sahay, Addl.P.P
------
Order No.02 Dated- 10-04-2026
Heard the parties.
The petitioner has been made accused in connection with S.T. Case No. 31 of 2026 arising out of Nawadih P.S. Case No. 57 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 310(2), 317(3), and Sections 25(1-B)a, 26, 35 of the Arms Act. Subsequently, cognizance has been taken for the offence under Sections 130 (2), 317(3), 111(2)(b), 114(4), 116(6), 117(7) of the B.N.S, 2023 and Sections 25(1-B)a, 25(6), 25(7), 26, 35 of the Arms Act.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner was involved in commission of dacoity and looted gold and silver jewelry and cash of Rs. 4,50,000/- from the house after beating mother and wife of the informant and also taken away Rs. 10-12 thousand from the shop of the informant. It is next submitted that the charge-sheet has been submitted against the petitioner without putting the petitioner to the test identification parade. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is next submitted that the petitioner undertakes that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and will not annoy or disturb the informant or witnesses of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 17.10.2025 as mentioned in para-09 of the instant bail application. Hence it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail.
Learned Addl.P.P . opposes the prayer for bail.
Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is
directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge-I, Bermo at Tenughat in connection with S.T. Case No. 31 of 2026 arising out of Nawadih P.S. Case No. 57 of 2025 with the condition that he will co- operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and will not annoy or disturb the informant or witnesses of the case.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) 10/04/2026 Amar/