Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 6540 (AP)

Arava Bhanubee v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

CRLP/5150/2026 · 2026-07-27

Maheswara Rao Kuncheam

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010321332026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3504] TUESDAY, THE 28th DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 5150/2026 Between: 1. ARAVA BHANUBEE, W/O ABDUL RAHEEM AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, OCC HOME MAKERR/O DALAVAYA PALLI, PULLAMPETAY.S.R KADAPA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH. 2. PAVALLA VINOD, S/O P. CHENCHU KRISHNAIAH AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, OCC BUSINESS R/O FLAT NO.3G, KRISHNATEJA APARTMENTS, TIRUPATI URBANTIRUPATI DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S): Petition under Section 437/438/439/482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Courtpleased to call for the records in crime No 20 of 2025 on the file of Tirupathi West Police Station j Tirupathi District and quash the same the Petitioner/Accused No. 1 and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition,the High Court may be pleased pleased to dispense with filing of the original certified copy in F.I.R No. 20 of 2025, dated 20.02.2025, On the file of the Tirupathi West Police Station, Tirupathi District before this Hon’ble Court and pass 2 IA NO: 2 OF 2026 Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition,the High Court may be pleased For the reasons stated in the accompanying quash petition grounds filed in support of the above criminal petition It is therefore prayed that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings in crime No. 20 of 2025 on the file of Tirupathi West Police StatiOn, Tirupathi District and pass Counsel for the Petitioner/accused: 1. RAMALAKSHMANA REDDY SANEPALLI Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S): 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 5150 of 2026 The Court made the following Order: Instant Criminal Petition, under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhitha, 2023, has been filed on behalf of the petitioner herein, seeking to quash the proceedings in Crime in FIR No.20 of 2025 of Tirupathi West Police Station, Tirupathi District, for the offence punishable under Sections 352, 353(1)(c), 353(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhitha, 2023. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner, after arguing for some time, has confined his argument to the extent of protecting the petitioner herein from the police on the ground that the offences alleged are punishable with imprisonment of less than seven (07) years and prays this Court to direct the police to follow the procedure as contemplated under Section 35(3) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. 3. On the other hand, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor did not oppose the same and concurred with the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner for the reason that the offences alleged are punishable with imprisonment of less than seven years. 4. Heard. Perused the entire available material on record. 4 5. Since the offences alleged are punishable with imprisonment of less than seven years and in view of the no objection expressed by the Assistant Public Prosecutor, this Court directs the respondent/police to follow the procedure as contemplated under Section 35(3) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 corresponding to Section 41A Cr.P.C., scrupulously as per the guidelines enunciated in Arnesh Kumar Vs. State of Bihar and another1, which was reiterated in the judgment of the Hon’ble Apex Court in Satendar Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and Another2. If it is noticed in the course of investigation that the petitioner has committed any offence which is punishable with imprisonment beyond seven years, the investigating officer is at liberty to proceed in accordance with the law. 6. Accordingly, this Criminal Petition is disposed of. Interlocutory applications, if any, pending shall stand closed. ____________________________________ JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM Date: 28.07.2026 krk 1 (2014) 8 SCC 273 2 2026 SCC OnLine SC 162 5 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM 49 CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 5150 of 2026 Date: 28.07.2026 krk