APHC010320062018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE 20th DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA WRIT PETITION NO: 14727 OF 2018 Between: 1. Saripalli Eswara Apparao,, S/o. Appalanaidu, Hindu, aged 35 years, Presently unemployed, R/o. D. No. 1-14, Cherlopalem Village and Panchayat, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. ...Petitioner AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh Rep by its Principal Secretary, (Revenue), Secretariat, Velagapudi, Guntur District. 2. The District Collector, Visakhapatnam, Visakhapatnam District. 3. The Tahsildar, Chelopalem Panchayat, Mungapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. 4. The Project Director DWMA Project, Visakhapatnam. ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toissue a writ, order or direction, particularly a Writ in the nature of Certiorari, calling for the records pertaining to the order in proceedings in vide his order L.Dis. No. 383/2016/Human Resources department, dated 31.05.2017 of the 2nd respondent herein and quash the same and to pass 2 VS,J W.P.No.14727 of 2018 IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased suspend the operation of the order in proceedings vide his order L.Dis. No. 383/2016/Human Resources department, dated 31.05.2017 of the 2nd respondent herein pending disposal of the above writ petition and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: K SAIRAM MURTHY Counsel for the Respondents: SPL C FOR NREGS(M S R CHANDRA MURTHY) Counsel for the Respondents:GP FOR REVENUE (AP) The Court made the following 3 VS,J W.P.No.14727 of 2018 ORDER: When the matter was listed on 18.12.2025, 05.02.2026, 22.06.2026 and 06.07.2026, there was no representation for the petitioner. Even, today also there is no representation for the petitioner. It shows that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the case. 2. In that view of the matter, the Writ Petition is dismissed for default. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ______________________ JUSTICE V.SUJATHA Date: 20.07.2026 KGR