Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 6533 (JHR)

KUNWAR KISPOTTA ALIAS MUNNA v. STATE OF JHARKHAND

Cr.M.P./949/2026 · 2026-04-17

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:JHHC:11112] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr.M.P. No.949 of 2026 ------ 1. Kunwar Kispotta @ Munna S/o Budhan Kispotta, Aged about 58 years, R/o H. No.163 C, Purani Ranchi, P.O.- Ranchi, P.S.- Kotwali, Dist. Ranchi, Jharkhand-834001 2. Agustina Mariyam Kujur @ Ritu aged about 36 years, D/o Jams Kujur, R/o 1st Street Road, Hindpiri, South Street, P.O.- G.P.O., P.S.- Hindpiri, Dist. Ranchi, Jharkhand-834001 … Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioners : Mr. Shubhashis Rasik Soren, Advocate Ms. Shobha Gloria Lakra, Advocate Ms. Preeti Hembrom, Advocate For the State : Ms. Shweta Singh, Addl. P. P. ------ Order No:-03 Dated:-17-04-2026 Heard the parties. This criminal miscellaneous petition has been filed by the petitioners with the prayer for restoration of Cr.M.P. No.39 of 2025 to its original file which stood dismissed for non-compliance of the peremptory order dated 10.02.2026 passed by this Court. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that Cr.M.P. No.39 of 2025 stood dismissed for non-compliance of the peremptory order dated 10.02.2026 passed by this Court to file the proof of deposit of Rs.1,000/- with the Jharkhand State Legal Services Authority (JHALSA). It is next submitted that due to inadvertence, the said amount could not be deposited within the stipulated time which resulted in dismissal of the said Cr.M.P. No.39 of 2025 for non-compliance of the said peremptory order dated 10.02.2026 passed by this Court. It is also submitted that the said amount has already been deposited and the proof of the same has also been filed. It is next submitted that non-compliance of the said peremptory order dated 10.02.2026 was neither deliberate nor intentional. It is also submitted that the petitioners have very good grounds to agitate in the said Cr.M.P. No.39 of 2025 and unless the same is restored to its original file, the petitioners will be highly prejudiced. Hence, it is submitted that the Cr.M.P. No.39 of 2025 be restored to its original file. Learned Addl.P.P. appearing for the State has not raised any serious objection. Considering the facts of the case and the aforesaid submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners, Cr.M.P. No.39 of 2025 is directed to be restored to its original file at the same stage at which it was before its dismissal. Registry is directed to list Cr.M.P. No.39 of 2025 before the concerned Bench after a week. This criminal miscellaneous petition is disposed of accordingly. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated-17.04.2026-Animesh/