ROUSHAN SRIVASTAVA ALIAS ROUSHAN KUMAR ALIAS ROSHAN KUMAR v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
A.B.A./1535/2026 · 2026-04-10
Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 6530 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 6530 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2026:JHHC:10393
--1-- A.B.A. No. 1535 of 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI
A.B.A. No. 1535 of 2026
---- Roushan Srivastava @ Roushan Kumar @ Roshan Kumar, aged about 24 years, Son of Vipin Prasad @ Vipin Srivastava, resident of Village-Kubba, P.O.- Kubba P.S.- Hunterganj, District- Chatra.
.... Petitioner -- Versus --
The State of Jharkhand
.... Opposite Party
----
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI
---
For the Petitioner :- Mr. Sushant Kumar Sinha, Advocate
For the State
:- Mrs. Vandana Bharti, A.P.P.
---- 02/10.04.2026 Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as the learned counsel appearing for the State.
2. The petitioner is apprehending their arrest in connection with Hunterganj P.S. Case No.47 of 2022 for the alleged offences registered under Sections 364, 34 of the Indian Penal Code pending in the Court of learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Chatra.
3.
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the name of the petitioner has come only on the confessional statement and petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. He further submits that when it has come to the knowledge of the victim he has filed the petition before the learned Sessions Judge in A.B.P. stating that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case.
2026:JHHC:10393
--2-- A.B.A. No. 1535 of 2026
4.
Learned counsel appearing for the State opposed the prayer and submits that the name of the petitioner has come on the confessional statement.
5. Considering that the name of the petitioner has come on the confessional statement and petition filed by the informant is at page-16 of the anticipatory bail application wherein it has been stated that petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case and in that view of the matter the petitioner is directed to surrender before the learned Court within two weeks and the learned Court shall release the petitioner on such terms and conditions or the sureties as the learned Court may deem fit and proper.
(Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Dated 10.04.2026 Simran/