Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 653 (RAJ)

RAJENDRA KUMAR S/O SHRI BANWARI LAL, v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMP/897/2026 · 2026-03-09

Anil Kumar Upman

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:10118] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 897/2026 1. Rajendra Kumar S/o Shri Banwari Lal, Aged About 40 Years, R/o Plot No. 23-K-5, C-Scheme, Chand Bihari Nagar, Near Lal Mandir, Khatipura, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 2. Smt. Reena Kanwar W/o Shri Vikas Singh, Aged About 41 Years, R/o Village Panchpahadi (Hapud), Tehsil Kotputali, Pachhodala, Jaipur. 3. Vikas Singh S/o Shri Sawai Singh, Aged About 44 Years, R/o Plot No. 08, Shiv Vihar, Niwaru Road, Masarampura, Jhotwara, Jaipur. ----Accused-Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P. ----Respondent 2. Vijay Kumar Ucchainiya S/o Shri Moti Lal Ucchainiya, Aged About 45 Years, R/o 217, Roy Colony, Hasanpura-C, Jaipur, Rajasthan ----Complainant/Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Arvind Balaut, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Ms. Arti Sharma, PP with Mr. Vijay Singh Yadav, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 09/03/2026 1. By way of this criminal misc. petition under Section 528 of BNSS, the accused-petitioners have approached this Court with a prayer to quash the FIR No.38/2025 registered at Police Station Jaipur Airport, District Jaipur City (East) for the offences punishable under Sections 318(4), 336(3), 340(2), 329(3) and 61(2)(b) of BNS, 2023, on the basis of compromise. 2. Parties are present in person. They have duly been identified by their respective counsel. [2026:RJ-JP:10118] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-897/2026] 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that parties have settled their dispute amicably. It is further submitted that due to compromise, further proceedings in the aforesaid FIR are fruitless. The written compromise has been annexed with this petition. 4. Learned counsel for complainant submits that complainant has no objection if the present misc. petition is allowed. 5. In view of the aforesaid and considering the submissions made on behalf of the respective parties; the material made available for perusal; considering the fact that parties have resolved their dispute amicably and also finding that the present case is wholly covered by the principle of law laid down by Hon'ble the Supreme Court in the case of Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab & Anr. reported in 2012 Cr.L.J. (SC) 4934 and in the case of State of Haryana & Ors. Vs. Choudhary Bhajan Lal & Ors. [AIR 1992 SC 604] and as such, the aforesaid FIR is liable to be quashed in view of compromise arrived at between the parties. 6. In view of the above, this criminal misc. petition is allowed and the FIR No.38/2025 registered at Police Station Jaipur Airport, District Jaipur City (East) is quashed and set aside. Consequence to follow. 7. Stay application and pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J MADAN/100