Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 653 (ALL)

RAM BHARAT @ RAM BHARAT SINGH YADAV v. STATE OF U.P. AND 11 OTHERS

WRIC/3101/2026 · 2026-03-18

Garima Prashad, Neeraj Tiwari

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 3101 of 2026 Court No. - 4 HON'BLE NEERAJ TIWARI, J. HON'BLE GARIMA PRASHAD, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State. 3. Present petition has been filed with following prayer:- "(i). Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing the respondent no.2 and 3 to restrain the private respondents no.8 to 12 not to interfere in the peaceful possession of the petitioner's land of Arazi No.275 Area 0.44 hectare situated at Village Mauja, Tehsil Jakhaniya, District Ghazipur and Hon'ble Court may further direct the respondent no.2 and 3 to take appropriate action against the respondent no.5 to 12. 3. Learned Standing Counsel has raised objection and submitted that present dispute relates to private person, which can be adjudicated, therefore, no relief can be granted. 4. Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed. 5. However, liberty is given to petitioner to seek appropriate remedy before the Competent Court of law. March 19, 2026 Junaid Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Shiv Chand Yadav, Shyam Lal Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Garima Prashad,J.) (Neeraj Tiwari,J.) Ram Bharat @ Ram Bharat Singh Yadav .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 11 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- JUNAID AHMAD High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- JUNAID AHMAD High Court of Judicature at Allahabad