Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 6529 (JHR)

PRITI DEVI @ DURGA DEVI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./3050/2026 · 2026-04-16

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

( 2026:JHHC:10892 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 3050 of 2026 ------ Priti Devi @ Durga Devi, aged about 38 years, wife of late Pappu Prasad Gupta, resident of Ward No. 6, Madhushala Road, Hussainabad Road, P.O.-Japla, P.S.-Hussainabad, Dist.- Palamau … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Anil Kumar, Sr. Advocate : Ms. Chandana Kumari, Advocate For the State : Mr. Bhola N. Ojha, Spl. P.P. ------ Order No.02 Dated- 16.04.2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Hussainabad P.S. Case No.21 of 2026 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 3(5) of the BNS, 2023 and under Sections 20(b) (ii) (B), 25, 29 of the NDPS Act. Learned senior counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner was in illegal possession of 4.259 Kgs of Ganja. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is next submitted that from the house of Anita Devi 3.085 kg of ganja and from the house of Savita Devi 2.992 Kgs of Ganja was recovered. It is next submitted that the Ganja recovered in total comes under the intermediate quantity. It is next submitted that the petitioner undertakes that she will co-operate with the trial of the case. It is next submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 03.02.2026 as mentioned in para-08 of the instant bail application. It is lastly submitted that the co-accused person with similar allegation has already been admitted to bail by this Court vide order dated 08.04.2026 in B.A. No.2829 of 2026. Hence it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned Spl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Special Judge, NDPS Act, Palamau in connection with Hussainabad P.S. Case No.21 of 2026 with the condition that she will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish her mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that she will not change her mobile number during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) 16.04.2026 Nandini-