Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 6523 (AP)

DASARI KRISHNA RAO v. THE STATE OF AP

WP/13313/2024 · 2026-07-21

B S Bhanumathi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010263572024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3311] Wednesday, the 22nd day of July, 2026 Present The Honourable Ms. Justice B. S. Bhanumathi Writ Petition No:13313 of 2024 Between: Dasari Krishna Rao ...Petitioner and The State of A.P. and others ...Respondents Counsel for the petitioner: 1. Srinivas Ambati Counsel for the respondents: 1. G.P. for Revenue 2. G.P. for Registration and Stamps The Court made the following: 2 W.P.No.13313 of 2024 ORDER: The writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking the following relief: “…to issue a writ, order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondent No. 5 in mutating petitioner’s land admeasuring Ac.0.24 cents out of total extent of Ac. 0.36 cents in Survey No. 30-12 (land parcel No.261) situated in Latchayyapeta village of Burja mandal in Srikakulam district in the name of the respondent No. 7 and subsequently in the name of the respondent No. 8 by deleting the petitioner’s name in revenue records for the above said land without issuing notice to the petitioner under Section 5(3) of the Andhra Pradesh Rights in Land and Pattadar Pass Books Act, 1971 and rules framed thereunder as illegal, arbitrary, violative of principles of natural justice and provisions of the Andhra Pradesh Rights in Land and Pattadar Pass Books Act, 1971 and rules framed there under, violative of full bench judgment of the High Court of Andhra Pradesh in Chinnam Pandurangam Vs. Mandal Revenue Officer on 11.07.2011 in W.P. No. 7868 of 2004 reported in 2007 (6) ALD 248 and offends Articles 14, 21 and 300- A of the Constitution of India and consequently set aside the mutation of the respondents Nos. 7 and 8 names with respect to the petitioner’s said land and direct the respondents Nos. 2 to 5 to maintain entire record of rights in petitioner’s favour for his agricultural land and to pass…” 2. Sri G. Divyatheja, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue, is present. 3 W.P.No.13313 of 2024 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner sought permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition and filed a memo dated 16.07.2026 to that effect. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Interim order granted earlier, if any, shall stand vacated. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. ________________________ JUSTICE B.S. BHANUMATHI Dated: 22.07.2026 NSM 4 W.P.No.13313 of 2024 30 The Honourable Ms. Justice B.S.Bhanumathi Writ Petition No: 13313 of 2024 Dated: 22.07.2026 NSM