Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 6522 (CHH)

DAMAN KUMAR LUNIYA v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPC/3114/2020 · 2026-04-14

Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:17154 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 3114 of 2020 1 - Daman Kumar Luniya S/o Shri Ramfal Luniya Aged About 45 Years Resident Of Village Navrangpur, Tahsil Lormi, District Mungeli Chhattisgarh., District : Mungeli, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh The Secretary, Panchayat And Rural Development Department , Mantralaya Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar , Naya Raipur , District Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - The Commissioner Bilaspur Division Bilaspur Chhattisgarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 3 - The Collector (Fisheries Department) Mungeli, District Mungeli Chhattisgarh., 4 - The Chief Executive Officer Zila Panchayat Mungeli, District Mungeli Chhattisgarh., 5 - The Chief Executive Officer Janpad Panchayat Lormi , District Mungeli Chhattisgarh. 6 - Smt. Rekhadevi Luniya Sarpanch Gram Panchayat Navrangpur , Tahsil Lormi, District Mungeli Chhattisgarh. 7 - Vishnu Prasad Luniya S/o Ramsevak Luniya Up Sarpanch Gram Panchayat Navrangpur, Tahsil Lormi , District Mungeli Chhattisgarh. ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : None. For State/Res : Ms. Vartika Shrivastava, PL. Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 15/04/2026 1. When the matter is called, no one appears for the petitioner. No representation AVINASH SHARMA Digitally signed by AVINASH SHARMA Date: 2026.04.17 10:59:29 +0530 2 is made. Even in the second call, none appears for the petitioner. 2. In view of above, this Court is left with no other option except to dismiss this petition for want of prosecution. 3. Accordingly, the instant petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Avinash