Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 6522 (CAL)

SANJIT MONDAL v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL

CRM (A)/301/2026 · 2026-02-25

Jay Sengupta

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

25.02.2026 Court No.28 Item No.19 ssi CRM (A) 301 of 2026 In Re: - An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Suraksha Nagarik Sanhita in connection with Pukhuria Police Station Case No. 583 of 2025 dated 25.11.2025 under Sections 316(2)/318(4)/112(2)/308 (7)/61(2) of the BNS 2023. And In the matter of: Sanjit Mondal. …. Petitioner Mr. Jisan Iqubal Hossain …for the petitioner Ms. Minoti Gomes …for the de facto Mr. Bitasok Banerjee Mr. Akash Ganguly ..for the State Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that while it was alleged that the petitioner had taken money to give job to the de facto complainant, he had returned to the informant the said sum of Rs. 25,000/- allegedly taken, without prejudice. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the de facto complainant submits that the money taken from the de facto complainant has, in fact, been returned. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail. He submits that the petitioner is a part of a racket who had been taking money from different victims on promise to give job. He relies on statements of other witnesses as well. 2 Considering the above and the other incriminating materials available in the case diary, I do not consider that this is to be a fit case for granting anticipatory bail. Accordingly, the application for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is rejected. (Jay Sengupta, J.)