Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 652 (KAR)

SRI. ERANAGOWDA v. SRI. DHARMAPPA

WP/39449/2025 · 2026-03-26

H T Narendra Prasad

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:17415 WP No. 39449 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 26TH DAY OF MARCH 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO.39449 OF 2025 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: 1. SRI. ERANAGOWDA R/O NAGAPPA PURADALA AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS R/O HALEVEERAPURA VILLAGE HIREKERUR TALUK HAVER DISTRICT-581210. 2. SRI. RAJU S/O NAGAPPA PURADALA AGED ABOUT 27 YEAR N/O HALEVEERAPURA VILLAGE HIREKERUR TALUK HAVERI DISTRICT-581210 …PETITIONERS (BY SMT. SUKANYA H D. ADVOCATE (ABSENT)) AND: 1. SRI. DHARMAPPA S/O MURUDABASAPPA PURADAL AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS AGRICULTURIST R/O HALEVEERAPURA VILLAGE HIREKERURU TALUK HAVERI DISTRICT-581210. 2. SMT. NAGAMMA @ RATHNAMMA W/O BHARAMAPPA BIDARI AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS Digitally signed by DHANALAKSHMI MURTHY Location: HIGH COURTOF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:17415 WP No. 39449 of 2025 R/O BATTIKOPPA VILLAGE RATTIHALLI TALUK HAVERI DISTRICT-581116. 3. SMT. DANAMMA W/O BASAVANYAPPA ENGALAGONDI AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS R/O CHAPPARADAHALLI VILLAGE RATTIHALLI TALUK HAVERI DISTRICT-581210. 4. SMT. ANNAPOORNAMMA W/O BASAVARAJAPPA KADADAKATTI AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS R/O TADAKANAHALLI VILLAGE HIREKERURU TALUK HAVERI DISTRICT-581210. 5. SMT. KUSUMA W/O MAHESHWARAPPA PURADALA AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS R/O HALEVEERAPURA VILLAGE HIREKERUR TALUK HAVERI DISTRICT-581210. 6. SRI. MANJUNATHA S/O MAHESHWARAPPA PURADALA AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS AGRICULTURIST R/O HALEVEERAPURA VILLAGE HIREKERUR TALUK HAVERI DISTRICT-581210. 7. SMT. LATHA @ LEELA W/O NAGARAJA MATTIMANI AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS R/O MATTIHALLI VILLAGE HIREKERUR TALUK HAVERI DISTRICT-581109. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:17415 WP No. 39449 of 2025 8. SMT. SHOBHA W/O HANUMANTHAPPA PURADALA AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS R/O HALEVEERAPURA VILLAGE HIREKERURU TALUK HAVERI DISTRICT-581210. 9. SRI. HARISHA S/O HANUMANTHAPPA PURADALA AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS AGRICULTURIST R/O HALEVEERAPURA VILLAGE HIREKERUR TALUK HAVERI DISTRICT-581210. 10. SRI HANUMANTHAPPA S/O HAMADEVAPPA AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS R/AT DINDADAHALLI VILLAGE SHIKARIGURA TALUK SHIVAMOGGA DISTRICT-577427. 11. SRI. RAVIKUMAR B/O HANUMANTHAPPA TYAVAREMANE AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS R/O DINDADAHALLI VILLAGE SHIKARIPURA TALUK SHIVAMOGGA DISTRICT-577427. …RESPONDENTS THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FILED PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DTD. 28.07.2025 PASSED ON I.A.NO.1 U/O XXXIX RULE 1 AND 2 R/W 151 OF CPC IN O.S.NO. 10/2025 BY THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC SHIKARIPURA PRODUCED HEREWITH AS ANNX-E. ALLOW THE WRIT PETITION BY SETTING ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ORDER OF TEMPORARY INJUNCTION RESTRAINING THE PETITIONERS FROM ALIENATING THE SUIT SCHEDULE PROPERTIES. - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:17415 WP No. 39449 of 2025 THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD ORAL ORDER This writ petition is filed by defendant Nos.9 and 10 under Articles 226 & 227 of the Constitution of India, challenging the order dated 28.07.2025 passed on IA No.1 filed under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 r/w. Section 151 of Code of Civil Procedure, in O.S.No.10/2025, whereby the trial court dismissed the said application. 2. The office has raised an objection regarding the maintainability of this writ petition. The office objection is upheld. 3. The writ petition is dismissed, reserving liberty to the petitioners to approach the appropriate legal forum, if law permits. Sd/- (H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD) JUDGE CM