Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 652 (ALL)

SMT. MEENA v. SUSHRI AYUSHI PANDEY, ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE (JUNIOR DIVISION)

CAPL/1090/2026 · 2026-03-18

Rohit Ranjan Agarwal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 1090 of 2026 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J. 1. Instructions have come from the side opposite, which are taken on record. 2. Sri Rahul Srivastava, learned counsel appearing for Allahabad High Court, states that the parties, on number of occasions, have absented themselves and, as such, application 7C could not have been decided. He further submits that the next date fixed in the matter is 25.3.2026. 3. In view of the said fact, opposite party is expected to comply the order of writ Court and decide the application 7C, in accordance with law, positively by the next date i.e. 25.3.2026. 4. Contempt application stands disposed of. March 19, 2026 Shekhar Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Kamlesh Kumar Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : (Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.) Smt. Meena .....Applicant(s) Sushri Ayushi Pandey, Additional Civil Judge (Junior Division) .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- SHASHI SHEKHAR PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- SHASHI SHEKHAR PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad