Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 65164 (MAD)

C.U.Vijayavarma v. Sri Priya Komagan

CRL MP/3505/2026 · 2026-02-26

Sunder Mohan

Criminal Appealbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRL MP No. 3505 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 26-02-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN CRL MP No. 3505 of 2026 and CRL RC No. 2116 of 2025 C.U.Vijayavarma S/o.Uthiradam, Rani Nagar, Vandigate, Chidambaram, Chidambaram Taluk, Cuddalore District. ..Petitioner(s) Vs Sri Priya Komagan W/o.Komagan, No. 256, Road Street, K.Adoor Post, Chidambaram Taluk, Cuddalore District. ..Respondent(s) CRL RC No. 2116 of 2025 C.U.Vijayavarma S/o.Uthiradam, Rani Nagar, Vandigate, Chidambaram, Chidambaram Taluk, Cuddalore district. ..Petitioner(s) Vs Sri Priya Komagan W/o.Komagan, No. 256, Road Street, K.Adoor Post, Chidambaram Taluk, Cuddalore District. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL MP No. 3505 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 ..Respondent(s) CRL MP No. 3505 of 2026 To Transpose the present Crl.R.C.No.2116 of 2025 pending on the file of the Honble Court as Criminal Appeal to set aside the order of acquittal dated 14.07.2025 made in STC.No.89 of 2021, on the file of the Judicial Magistrate- II, Chidambaram. CRL RC No. 2116 of 2025 To allow the revision case and setaside the order dt. 14.07.2025 passed in Crl.Appeal No. 40/2023 on the file of the II nd Additional District and Sessions Court, Chidambaram reversing the order dt. 06.04.2023 in STC No. 89/2021 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Chidambaram. CRL MP No. 3505 of 2026 For Petitioner(s): Mr.D.Baskar For Respondent(s): Mr.R.Bharath Kumar ORDER The present petition is filed to transpose the present Revision into an Appeal. 2.The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the Revision has been filed against the Judgment of the appellate Court acquitting the respondent of the offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. He would submit that the petitioner ought to have filed an appeal against acquittal. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL MP No. 3505 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4 3.The learned counsel for the petitioner's request is justified. Hence, the Registry is directed to convert and number the revision as an appeal. 4.The Criminal Miscellaneous Petition is accordingly ordered. 26-02-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No TSG To The Judicial Magistrate No.II, Chidambaram. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL MP No. 3505 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 SUNDER MOHAN J. TSG CRL MP No. 3505 of 2026 and CRL RC No. 2116 of 2025 26-02-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis