- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:11608 WP No. 1154 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS WRIT PETITION NO. 1154 OF 2025 (SCST) BETWEEN: SMT. C. SHRIDEVI W/O MUNISWAMY, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, RESIDING AT MANDIBELE VILLAGE, MANDIBELE POST, VIJAYAPURA HOBLI, DEVANAHALLI TALUK, BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT-562 135. …PETITIONER (BY SMT. SUMATHI S., ADVOCATE (ABSENT)) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REVENUE DEPARTMENT, M.S.BUILDING, BENGALURU-560 001, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT, BEERASANDRA VILLAGE, KUNDANA HOBLI, DEVANAHALLI TALUK-562 110. 3. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, DODDABALLAPURA SUB-DIVISION, DODDABALLAPURA-561 203. Digitally signed by LAKSHMI T Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:11608 WP No. 1154 of 2025 4. M. NAGARAJU, S/O MUNISHAMAPPA, AGED ABOUT YEARS, GANGAVARA BEEDI, MANDIBELE VILLAGE, MANDIBELE POST, VIJAYAPURA HOBLI, DEVANAHALLI TALUK, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT-562 135. 5. CORPORATION BANK REP BY ITS MANAGER, DEVANAHALLI BRANCH, DEVANAHALLI-562 110. 6. R. KESHAV S/O RAMACHANDRAPPA, AGED ABOUT YEARS, MANDIBELE VILLAGE, VIJAYAPURA HOBLI, DEVANAHALLI TALUK, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT-562 135. 7. KONERU SATHYANARAYANA S/O KONERU LAKSHMAIAH, AGED ABOUT YEARS, R/AT NO.212, BELLARY ROAD, SADASHIVANAGAR, BENGALURU-560 080. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. NAVYA SHEKHAR, AGA FOR R1 TO R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASHING THE ORDER PASSED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT IN PTCL (DE) SR NO.29/2017-18 DT.06-07-2018 ANNEXURE-H CONFIRMED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT IN THE APPEAL IN LND.SC.ST.APPEAL NO.87/2018 BY AN ORDER OF DISMISSAL DT: 31-03-2023 VIDE ANNEXURE-K, BY ALLOWING THE ABOVE WRIT. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:11608 WP No. 1154 of 2025 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS ORAL ORDER On 11.02.2026 the following order was passed: “Finally, two weeks time is granted to the petitioner for compliance of office objections, failing which, the writ petition shall be listed on 25.02.2026 for dismissal.” 2. Matter is called out. There is no representation for the petitioner. 3. Office objections have not been complied with. 4. Consequently, the writ petition stands dismissed for non-compliance of office objections. Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE HB List No.: 2 Sl No.: 2